Closed schwartsburd closed 6 months ago
@schwartsburd thanks for the proposal.
Your first option (Saccoloma s.l. with Orthiopteris in synonymy) is already used in PPG I, so there is no need to vote on it.
You seem to be arguing against the second option since you say "I have not found any good morphological character to separate (Paleotropical) Orthiopteris from (Neotropical) Saccoloma s.str."
So it seems there is nothing to vote on here, and I am closing (disregarding) this proposal.
If you do want to propose the second the option, please feel free to edit your text above and re-open this issue.
Author(s) of proposal
Pedro B. Schwartsburd
Name of taxon
Saccoloma and Orthiopteris
Rank of taxon
Genus
Approximate number of species affected
25
Description of change
There has been about four genera described that are related to what we understand now as Saccolomataceae. Among these four genera, two has been synonymized a long time ago, and they represent no issues for now. The other two names (Orthiopteris and Saccoloma) are still sometimes used, but in some different point of views, of which we should opt and adapt to use in PPG II.
The firsts phylogenies including Saccolomataceae species showed a polyphyletic group, but this was later questioned, and the new evidence arouse that some samples might have been mislabelled, contaminated or mis-identified - see PPG I (2016: 576), Schwartsburd (2022: 157). The only comprehensive phylogeny of Saccolomataceae that I am aware of is the provisional one that I generated in my taxonomic review of the Brazilian species (Schwartsburd 2022: Fig. 1), using three chloroplast genes. My conclusions were:
Reason for change
My proposal is: we vote to decide if we adopt Saccoloma s.l. in PPG II, or Saccoloma s.str. and Orthiopteris (but in a monophyllectic manner). Therefore, we could vote as:
We vote NO, and adopt Saccoloma s.str. for the Neotropical species, and Orthiopteris for the Paleotropical species.
Sorry adapting the issue in this format, but I thought it would be easier to handle (instead of creating two antagonic issues)
Reference(s) for publication of the name
Saccoloma_Brazil_paginado.pdf
Kramer, K. U. 1990 Dennstaedtiaceae. Pp. 81–94 in: K.U. Kramer & P. S. Green (eds.), Vol. I Pteridophytes and Gymnosperms, In: K. Kubitzki (ed.), The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
Luong, T. T., P. H. Hovenkamp & M. S. M. Sosef. 2015. Revision of the fern genus Orthiopteris(Saccolomataceae) in Malesia and adjacent regions. PhytoKeys 53: 39–71. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.53.4955
Schwartsburd, P.B. 2022. The fern genus Saccoloma (Saccolomataceae) in Brazil, including new species and new combinations. Brittonia, 74(2): 155–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12228-021-09689-2
Sehnem, A. 1972. Pteridáceas. In: R. Reitz (ed.), Flora Ilustrada Catarinense, part I, fasc. PTER. Herbário Barbosa Rodrigues, Itajaí.
Tryon, R. M. & A. F. Tryon. 1982. Ferns and allied plants, with special reference to tropical America. Springer-Verlag, New York.
List the numbers of any related issues
No response
Code of Conduct