search

pthane / QP-Data

0 stars 0 forks source link

Finishing Touches #10

Open pthane opened 3 years ago

pthane commented 3 years ago

Hola @jvcasillas ,

I'm putting together the finishing touches of my QP, which is, of course, quite exciting. I have a few minor questions that I think you can help me to resolve quite easily. After this, I'm more or less ready to move forward with sending the final draft.

  1. The broom method of looking for the confidence intervals returns the following error: Error: No tidy method for objects of class glmerMod.. Thoughts?

  2. I was wondering if we could schedule an appointment for next week or the following, as I need some help finishing up the coding for that tedious lexical item analysis. I have coded the subjunctive data by hand in the interest of time, but I suppose I should definitely try to automate that process going forward. I'd also love to get some insights on how to interpret a three-way interaction for the aspect project.

  3. I am going to try to run a TOST myself for the proficiency comparison. It looks quite simple, but if I run into difficulties, I may reach back out (I wanted to get this message out to you, so I figured I'd just put this on the radar for now).

  4. Would you recommend a graph for the proficiency level of all participants? That is, should I show a graph of the distribution of proficiency levels to show how it is distributed? I know that this isn't an explicit research question, but it might be useful for the purposes of data visualization.

Thanks in advance!

Saludos, Patrick

jvcasillas commented 3 years ago

Hola @jvcasillas ,

I'm putting together the finishing touches of my QP, which is, of course, quite exciting. I have a few minor questions that I think you can help me to resolve quite easily. After this, I'm more or less ready to move forward with sending the final draft.

  1. The broom method of looking for the confidence intervals returns the following error: Error: No tidy method for objects of class glmerMod.. Thoughts?

There is an add-on, supplement, or whatever to the broom package called broom.mixed. That is probably what you need.

  1. I was wondering if we could schedule an appointment for next week or the following, as I need some help finishing up the coding for that tedious lexical item analysis. I have coded the subjunctive data by hand in the interest of time, but I suppose I should definitely try to automate that process going forward. I'd also love to get some insights on how to interpret a three-way interaction for the aspect project.

I would suggest you try to do it and then post an issue for whatever you get stuck on. We've talked about interpreting 3-way interactions in class. I refer you to last weeks slides.

  1. I am going to try to run a TOST myself for the proficiency comparison. It looks quite simple, but if I run into difficulties, I may reach back out (I wanted to get this message out to you, so I figured I'd just put this on the radar for now).

They are quite simple. I don't think you will have any problems. This is the best reference: https://github.com/Lakens/TOSTER

  1. Would you recommend a graph for the proficiency level of all participants? That is, should I show a graph of the distribution of proficiency levels to show how it is distributed? I know that this isn't an explicit research question, but it might be useful for the purposes of data visualization.

Seems like a good idea. I don't see how it would be bad.

Thanks in advance!

Saludos, Patrick

pthane commented 3 years ago

There is an add-on, supplement, or whatever to the broom package called broom.mixed. That is probably what you need.

Fixed, thanks.

  1. I was wondering if we could schedule an appointment for next week or the following, as I need some help finishing up the coding for that tedious lexical item analysis. I have coded the subjunctive data by hand in the interest of time, but I suppose I should definitely try to automate that process going forward. I'd also love to get some insights on how to interpret a three-way interaction for the aspect project.

I would suggest you try to do it and then post an issue for whatever you get stuck on. We've talked about interpreting 3-way interactions in class. I refer you to last weeks slides.

I will post an issue on the lexical item correlation soon.

Yes, I have seen how to interpret them by looking through the graphs and seeing the linearity of the relationship. I've asked a few peers if they had any suggestions and they did not. In essence, it's easy for me to interpret when I see your graphs that you have made for us, but it's not helping me to interpret my own data for which I don't have visuals (nor do I know how to get them in the way that you created those lovely graphs at the beginning of last class).

  1. I am going to try to run a TOST myself for the proficiency comparison. It looks quite simple, but if I run into difficulties, I may reach back out (I wanted to get this message out to you, so I figured I'd just put this on the radar for now).

They are quite simple. I don't think you will have any problems. This is the best reference: https://github.com/Lakens/TOSTER

Well, I had problems, but I spoke with Silvia. She and David use a one-way ANOVA for this. I'm going to do it with an LM. Perhaps it's killing a fly with a rifle, but it'll work (as far as I know).