search

ptitSeb / box64

Box64 - Linux Userspace x86_64 Emulator with a twist, targeted at ARM64 Linux devices
https://box86.org
MIT License
3.73k stars 267 forks source link

[SDORYON1] Oryon1 (Snapdragon Elite) support #1786

Closed powpingdone closed 2 weeks ago

powpingdone commented 3 weeks ago

Some compiler flags for the Oryon1 support. I still need to test this. I don't believe that this cpu has 32 bit support, though I'm not 100% sure.

ptitSeb commented 3 weeks ago

There is no 32bits support in Oryon1 CPU Cores.

powpingdone commented 3 weeks ago

That's kinda what I figured, but I didn't find a solid source anywhere.

ptitSeb commented 3 weeks ago

That's a trending with new chips anyway. Cortex X, M1, Oryon... All have droped the 32bits support to save some silicon.

Side note, the official naming is "X", with 2 derivative: X-Elite and X-Plus.

powpingdone commented 3 weeks ago

If you're talking about the X1E naming stuff, I'll go ahead and modify it to be something more readable.

powpingdone commented 2 weeks ago

I'm sorry that I have to ask this, but what's the best way to test these flags for compatibility?

ptitSeb commented 2 weeks ago

I'm sorry that I have to ask this, but what's the best way to test these flags for compatibility?

What do you mean? Testing if the binary build and run on an X-Elite/X-Plus laptop running linux?

powpingdone commented 2 weeks ago

Yeah, kinda. Making sure I don't run into instructions that aren't in the CPU. I might have blown away my previous Gentoo install with these compiler flags, even though I copied them from the GCC repo. I already have (abused) a X1E laptop into Linux, so it's not a issue of not having the device.

powpingdone commented 2 weeks ago

It does pass the test suite with -fsanitize={undefined,address} and no sanitizer on gcc-13, so it might be ok.

powpingdone commented 2 weeks ago

I'm going to presume if it passes the tests, then it's "ok."

ptitSeb commented 2 weeks ago

looks good to me. I'll try to test later (tomorrow?)