in the intro where we describe what the ThemeRegistry is, we can actually take out the "modular" approach. this actually isnt a modular approach, and the rules regarding access control are baked into the registry contract. we should be linking to this repo instead of the "remote-access-control" one
i think its (only very slightly) confusing that we have the cool graphic of goerli.etherscan, but then are linking to mainnet etherscan. i dont think we need to change anything, but perhaps we could clarify some language about the theme registry being available at the same address on multiple chains? @salieflewis could you chime in here? also we're gonna need to provide support for the new testnet that is coming at some point, just flagging that for us to be aware of (cuz goerli might fully die)
"On the contract's page, click on the "Connect to Web3" button located on the top right corner. This will prompt you to connect your wallet." I dont think most people know you can do this. i think a screenshot here would help
The header "Write Contract" is confusing for more people I assume. I think something more like "prepare transaction" prob is a little easier to digest
this bullet point "You'll need to provide the required input parameters." reads a little random. could we skip/remove this, or maybe if we want to keep it use it as a space to provide info on ethereum function inputs more generally?
i think providing the roles first, then the tuple shape, and THEN providing the example input for them to swap in and out addresses/roles would make more sense. right now u read that first without knowing what the diff roles are or what even the tuple looks like which is confusing i think
more screenshots for the "confirm transaction" bit may be helpful (particurarly in showing what it looks like on etherscan when someones wallet is properly connected, where to press send txn, etc)
"Review the transaction details, and if everything looks correct, confirm the transaction." I actually think this is confusing and we should just remove it. "if everything looks correct" is not helpful to ppl who dont know what looks correct or not
random thing not super related to the content is that the styling of this site feels non cohesive with other PA brand touch points. idk if its final or not just calling it out. dont think its a big deal either way
Feedback (cc @Valcoholics):
random thing not super related to the content is that the styling of this site feels non cohesive with other PA brand touch points. idk if its final or not just calling it out. dont think its a big deal either way
Originally posted by @0xTranqui in https://github.com/public-assembly/flexible-docs/issues/23#issuecomment-1488783844