search

publiclab / wherewebreathe

wherewebreathe.org
2 stars 7 forks source link

Overall question progress indicator #38

Closed jywarren closed 10 years ago

jywarren commented 10 years ago

Something like "you've answered 10 of 43 questions" above or below the questions themselves. I can take a pass at what this should look like in a mockup.

jywarren commented 10 years ago

Maybe also "in this section"

jywarren commented 10 years ago

There are basic progress bars in bootstrap... Could we try one out above the questions? Or below, better actually as its ancillary info.

jywarren commented 10 years ago

Also, @shapironick, do we want to be able to say either "you answered this question x days ago" and "has your answer changed?"

Can people go back and change their answers or reanswer them, or delete old answers? Those are three separate approaches, to be precise. Sorry if this had been covered somewhere else and we can open a new "repeating/editing answers" issue if you prefer, @mmmelissa.

shapironick commented 10 years ago

It would definitely be great to have a "have your answers changed?" or more specifically "have your symptoms changed?" because with time symptoms will probably get worse, and having that data on the sequence of symptoms onset reported in near real time would be amazing!

On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 2:59 PM, Jeffrey Warren notifications@github.com wrote:

Also, @shapironick https://github.com/shapironick, do we want to be able to say either "you answered this question x days ago" and "has your answer changed?"

Can people go back and change their answers or reanswer them, or delete old answers? Those are three separate approaches, to be precise. Sorry if this had been covered somewhere else and we can open a new "repeating/editing answers" issue if you prefer, @mmmelissa https://github.com/mmmelissa.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/publiclab/wherewebreathe/issues/38#issuecomment-50887006 .

jywarren commented 10 years ago

To simplify this, we could invite people to run through a whole question block periodically. I'm going to add to the database design issue to ask if we can have a "repeatable" value on each question, so that we don't re-ask things that won't change. @novakn - how often would some questions need to be re-asked? Can we choose a standard interval to avoid having to record periodicity for each question?

Actual implementation of re-asking questions can probably wait, i just want to know so we can plan for it, possibly in phase 2.

shapironick commented 10 years ago

That seems like a great way to streamline the process.

On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 3:46 PM, Jeffrey Warren notifications@github.com wrote:

To simplify this, we could invite people to run through a whole question block periodically. I'm going to add to the database design issue to ask if we can have a "repeatable" value on each question, so that we don't re-ask things that won't change. @novakn https://github.com/novakn - how often would some questions need to be re-asked? Can we choose a standard interval to avoid having to record periodicity for each question?

Actual implementation of re-asking questions can probably wait, i just want to know so we can plan for it, possibly in phase 2.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/publiclab/wherewebreathe/issues/38#issuecomment-50892563 .

jywarren commented 10 years ago

Moved it to a new issue in #48. But an indicator bar would be great to have before Phase II if we have time -- re-assigning milestone for this issue.

mmnoo commented 10 years ago

OK, Indicator bar is on the near future to do list. (Im trying to figure out why sometimes GitHub emails me and sometimes does not even when I am mentioned, so sorry for my non response on some issues)

One thing though is for phase I, it will give funny numbers because of the way questions asked based on the answer of other questions work. Best not to work on a workaround for that though, because I am going to have to change the questionnaire logic for Phase II anyway. Might be better to have it there for looks now, but wire it up to the new logic for phase II. Thoughts?

jywarren commented 10 years ago

We could say "3 of approx 25 questions" or just show the progress bar for Qs answered out of total possible questions for this section and not name the precise # of questions. Then say "Question set 1 of 4" or whatever the total # of sets is. Could that work?

On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 11:16 AM, Melissa notifications@github.com wrote:

OK, Indicator bar is on the near future to do list. (Im trying to figure out why sometimes GitHub emails me and sometimes does not even when I am mentioned, so sorry for my non response on some issues)

One thing though is for phase I, it will give funny numbers because of the way questions asked based on the answer of other questions work. Best not to work on a workaround for that though, because I am going to have to change the questionnaire logic for Phase II anyway. Might be better to have it there for looks now, but wire it up to the new logic for phase II. Thoughts?

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/publiclab/wherewebreathe/issues/38#issuecomment-50903709 .