pucardotorg / dristi

MIT License
2 stars 12 forks source link

UAT | Judgement Order #1337

Open Taherabharmal opened 1 month ago

Taherabharmal commented 1 month ago

In the judgement order, the following issues exist: 1) details prepopulated from case details are not displayed in order 2) based on the holding, final outcome is not updated on view a case page 3) case is not appearing in closed cases 4) judgement update not available on view a case overview screen (https://www.figma.com/design/fwFYdlymVjggLOltqnXWsY/Hand-off-(Digit)?node-id=7707-99424&t=ghUMDKuebnaVwM84-0)

enhacement: Put note as follows below judgement heading: All documents marked as evidence will automatically be attached to the judgement. In case any additional evidences are to be considred, please mark them as an evidence from the documents tab in the case.

storm20198 commented 1 month ago

@vaibhavct go through this to implement judgement order types https://github.com/pucardotorg/mdms-data/blob/develop/data/pg/case/OutcomeType.json

vaibhavct commented 1 month ago

@Taherabharmal from where I should get these fields for judgement order? Date of Occurence Date of Apprehension Date of Release on Bail Date of Commencement of Trial Date of close of trial Date of sentence or Order Offence

Taherabharmal commented 1 month ago

See mapping in functional specs sheet

Regards, Tahera Bharmal Product Manager eGovernment Foundation +91 9637295165

On Tue, 13 Aug 2024 at 5:43 PM, vaibhavct @.***> wrote:

@Taherabharmal https://github.com/Taherabharmal from where I should get these fields for judgement order? Date of Occurence Date of Apprehension Date of Release on Bail Date of Commencement of Trial Date of close of trial Date of sentence or Order Offence

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/pucardotorg/dristi/issues/1337#issuecomment-2286100825, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/A7PRVEA7354ENVID7KSEAI3ZRHZ5BAVCNFSM6AAAAABML6QLK6VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDEOBWGEYDAOBSGU . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

vaibhavct commented 1 month ago

From where should I pick these values, @atulgupta2024 ? Edit - Also, how do we get the details about the judgment date in caseDetails api (to show on overview page)?

Taherabharmal commented 1 month ago

See here, field mapped to fields collected/generated during case: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/12tJW0ipniwRyJ9mUo4bEVmm98VZqyQdiZih7wWJ43wc/edit?gid=250166509#gid=250166509

vaibhavct commented 1 month ago

@Taherabharmal These fields are not coming in case search API. @atulgupta2024 Can you please tell me from where I should pick this fields from? c.c. @Ramu-kandimalla

atulgupta2024 commented 1 month ago

@vaibhavct we discussed this yesterday evening. hope this is sorted out now.

Ramu-kandimalla commented 3 days ago

Hi @rajeshcherukumalli Please verify and confirm the issue in UAT environment

Mahesh-Vishwanath1 commented 2 days ago

Hi @ashishbeehyv I am still encountering issues with the judgment of the order: 1)In the 'Finding/Holding' field dropdown, the 'Partially Allowed' option is currently displayed in all capital letters. It should be formatted in standard case, with only the first letter capitalized and the rest in lowercase. https://jam.dev/c/08eacd8b-056e-47c9-9868-07db12a987cd 2)The 'Complainant's Residence' or 'Description of Complainant' is missing. (If the residence is coming from the back end, there’s no need for the description; otherwise, the description field should be shown as an optional input.) https://jam.dev/c/6275713b-aaa7-4dbb-bf09-0b4facf9cc8e 3) The 'Content' field is supposed to have an audio option as per the Figma design, but it is incorrectly showing up in the 'Sentence of Order' field.https://jam.dev/c/f6ae60e4-6c29-4311-8d9c-5e754821a8bf