New time stamp?

[merkelp]

Hello,

would it be possible to clone some of the quality monitoring plots and use a different time stamp on the x-axis? I am talking about the plots on the following pages: http://www.physics.purdue.edu/cmsfpix/Submission_p/summary/test_list.php http://www.physics.purdue.edu/cmsfpix/Submission_p/summary/time.php http://www.physics.purdue.edu/cmsfpix/Submission_p/summary/fulltest.php

For the new time stamp, would it be possible to grab the time of receiving a module at either Purdue or Nebraska, from RTI? This would be very close to the time the bare module was bump bonded, and it would be very useful to monitor as a function of that. If it is possible, there would also be an additional plot that would be interesting: a histogram, where every bin on the x-axis is one week in this reception time, and the bin would be split into total number of modules, assembled, tested/graded at -20, A, B, C. All those components in different colors, so that one can easily see the amounts, and the grade yields evolving with time.

Thanks, Petra

[gneeser]

Petra, I added received lines for the post-assembly and module quality graphs. The assembly over time graph already uses that field, however.

I'll set to working on that histogram as well.

-Greg

[merkelp]

Hi Greg, thanks, I saw. What I meant however, is to clone the plots (make a second set of them) and use this new time stamp on the x-axis instead of the assembly or testing time stamp. Thanks, Petra

[gneeser]

Petra, Sorry about the delay, between spring break and other work concerns this took longer than anticipated. In any event, I have two plots ready for you to take a look at: http://www.physics.purdue.edu/cmsfpix/Submission_t/graphing/assemblybybatch_grapher.php http://www.physics.purdue.edu/cmsfpix/Submission_t/graphing/testbybatch_grapher.php

Is this what you were looking for?

I'm still working on the plots with the alternate x-axis, but they should be done soon.

-Greg

[merkelp]

Hi Greg, Looks good, thanks! Looking forward to the other plots.

Thanks, Petra

Sent from my iPhone

On Mar 23, 2016, at 4:40 PM, gneeser notifications@github.com wrote:

Petra, Sorry about the delay, between spring break and other work concerns this took longer than anticipated. In any event, I have two plots ready for you to take a look at: http://www.physics.purdue.edu/cmsfpix/Submission_t/graphing/assemblybybatch_grapher.php http://www.physics.purdue.edu/cmsfpix/Submission_t/graphing/testbybatch_grapher.php

Is this what you were looking for?

I'm still working on the plots with the alternate x-axis, but they should be done soon.

-Greg

— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub

[gneeser]

Petra, How does this one look? http://www.physics.purdue.edu/cmsfpix/Submission_t/graphing/postassemblybybatch_grapher.php

-Greg

[merkelp]

Hi Greg, It's looking good. I am especially curious to see the plot with the different grades as a function of this time.

Thanks, Petra

Sent from my iPhone

On Mar 25, 2016, at 12:08 PM, gneeser notifications@github.com wrote:

Petra, How does this one look? http://www.physics.purdue.edu/cmsfpix/Submission_t/graphing/postassemblybybatch_grapher.php

-Greg

— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub

[gneeser]

Petra, And here's the last one: http://www.physics.purdue.edu/cmsfpix/Submission_t/graphing/testbybatch_lin_grapher.php

How does that look? Any bugs you can see with any of these?

-Greg

[lantone]

Hi Greg,

I'm loving this plot:

http://www.physics.purdue.edu/cmsfpix/Submission_t/graphing/testbybatch_grapher.php

Quick question: It's labeled as "Module -20 Grades". There have been several modules that were manually graded as C based on the +17 results and never tested at -20. How would you expect those modules to show up in this plot? I think we'd want them to show as "Grade C" rather than "Received". If that's not already the case could it be adjusted?

Thanks,

Jamie

[gneeser]

Jamie, I actually have a fix in there to account for that - if the module has been rejected, it is binned as "C." Should I change some text to reflect that?

[lantone]

Cool, thanks. Since the grade is only assigned once, I think you could avoid any inaccuracies by just using "Module Grade" instead of "Module Grade at -20".

[lantone]

Oh, and does "Received" always correspond to a DB grade of "I"? If so I'd suggesting changing "Received" to "Incomplete". Or maybe there are some edge cases I'm not accounting for?

[gneeser]

Received corresponds to the timestamp (grouped by batch) when the modules are received at the assembly sites.

[lantone]

Sure, I get that, my point is that "Received" isn't a grade we give a module, so it sorta sticks out as odd in this plot. If I were (naively) making this plot, I'd just get the module's grade from the DB and it'd always be A,B,C, or I. But maybe there's a reason you don't do it that way? Maybe a module isn't assigned a grade until it's assembled or something?

[gneeser]

Well, since I binned the batches by retrieving the received dates it made sense to me to use that as the baseline for how many were in a batch, and it more closely resembles the plots I based it off of. Now that you mention it, though, for this plot it does make a lot more sense to have that as "not graded" or something like that. So I'll do that!

[lantone]

ok great, thanks Greg!

[gneeser]

All, I pushed the changes to the live version of the site. You can see the changes on the Module Quality Graphs page.

Note that to get more details, you can click on the button up top to view more of the graphs. Due to increasing load times, I moved some of the less-used plots to a separate page.

-Greg