improper 533

[cwulfman]

Record 202730 is the correct print description record, OCLC 1537507, however, there is a 533 in this record, which should only be used in microform description records. This isn’t a deal-breaker, but if you could remove this field, that would be best

[cwulfman]

This seems to be the record in question, but I don't see a 533. @ma20 , could you help me find it?

02065cas a22005417a 4500 202730 20140602103234.0 831027d19151916nyuwr p 0 0eng c ca 19000195 sn 88036976 8807 013914156 Uk AU@ 000005998851 (CStRLIN)NJPG83-S4716 ABB7684TS (OCoLC)1537507 MUL eng MUL NYG PIT NST EYM PIT DLC IUL OCLCG UKMGB OCLCQ OCLCF pcc premarc n-us-ny PULL AP2 .B87 051 B898 Bruno's weekly / edited by Guido Bruno in his garret on Washington Square. New York, N.Y. : Guido Bruno, 1915-1916. v. : ill. ; 21-29 cm. Weekly Vol. 1 (July 3, 1915)-v. 3 (Dec. 30 1916). Also issued on microfilm. Description based on: Vol. 1, no. 8, (Sept. 4, 1915); title from caption. Latest issue consulted: Vol. 1, no. 18 (Nov. 20th, 1915). Ex copy 2: Original printed wrappers. ark:/88435/9w032569r bmtnaaq_1915-07-12_01 vol.1,no.1 1915-07-12 American periodicals. New York (N.Y.) Periodicals. Greenwich Village (New York, N.Y.) Periodicals. American periodicals. fast (OCoLC)fst00807335 New York (State) New York. fast (OCoLC)fst01204333 New York (State) New York Greenwich Village. fast (OCoLC)fst01322891 Periodicals. fast (OCoLC)fst01411641 Bruno, Guido, 1884-1942. Bruno's weekly (DLC)sn 94082559 (OCoLC)8413898 Greenwich Village (OCoLC)1751582 Bruno's (DLC)sn 90018036 (OCoLC)21508988 http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/v979v445n DLC MiU PPiU C0 PUL 202730

[ma20]

@cwulfman This appears to be what we call a "legacy record," an older record that served as a master bib ID onto which all copies of that item--in any format--were attached. There are four separate items attached to this record: three copies of the real McCoy in RBSC, and one microform copy stored at ReCAP. We will need to create a new record for the microform copy, which is simple enough to do, although I do not have the authority to do it myself. Would you like me to reach out to someone who can?

[cwulfman]

@ma20 Hathi specifically doesn't want the microfilm record -- only the print record. So they would like all stuff about the microform copy removed. Dana said I could just remove the 533 field, but I don't see a 533 field. What else do I need to do to remove the microform information?

[ma20]

@cwulfman What's curious is that I don't see the 533 field in the record you copy+pasted above, but I do see it in the Voyager cataloging module. My fear is that because there is an actual microfilm copy attached to this record, it won't be as simple as deleting the 533 field. In order to reconcile this problem we would need separate Bib records for the microfilm copy and the print copy. That way we retain all the forms of media in the searchable catalog and we get you a clean, print-specific record to send to Hathi. This is an easy thing to do; I just have to get someone to do it.

[cwulfman]

Done