Closed tpendragon closed 5 years ago
@tpendragon I can't access the file you referenced, but "Bayonne" refers to plans for the Bayonne Bridge which we don't have permission to put up.
You'll see it there--bayonne.mets
.
@joycebcat I granted you access to that folder, not that it's anything interesting--a bunch of tarballs containing METS similar to those we use to populate the PUDL.
Question: where should the bayonne images / mets go since they're not going into figgy? should they just be deleted?
There is an image in the drive for this collection that doesn't have a mets file:
$ ls /mnt/hydra_sources/pudl/pudl0090/
1380014 1433926 1741879 428041 bayonne
$ ls /mnt/hydra_sources/ingest_scratch/METS/pudl0090/
1380014.mets 1433926.mets 1741879.mets
@hackmastera There's only three in the PUDL collection, I'm guessing one got shot after we stopped ingesting items into PUDL. @joycebcat @jpstroop is that the case?
I don't know whether we need to keep (or should keep) the Bayonne images at all or not. As far as the one without a mets file goes, I think your guess is probably correct. These were initially treated as simple new additions until somebody alerted us to the background and then the usual workflow was stopped.
the one with no mets looks like it might be volumes 8-43 of this journal: https://catalog.princeton.edu/catalog/428041
$ ls /mnt/hydra_sources/pudl/pudl0090/428041/
008 010 012 014 016 018 020 022 024 026 028 030 032 034 036 038 040 042 044
009 011 013 015 017 019 021 023 025 027 029 031 033 035 037 039 041 043
deploy@figgy-staging1:/opt/figgy/current$ ls /mnt/hydra_sources/pudl/pudl0090/428041/008/
000000002.tif 000000039.tif 000000076.tif ...
Argh! It can't be issues 8-43 related to that bib record, because that bib only covers v. 70 onwards. I don't have any memory at all of this title or the titles it absorbed from the PUDL days. We didn't tend to put serials into PUDL anyway. I can't even guess what bib record they might really apply to without seeing the images.
Hm, it does look like that title, though. Here is one image
All ingested fine on staging except one of the objects wasn't added to the collection. not sure why; possibly because it's a multivolume work? there may be a bug in the code when it comes to MVWs. regardless, I can add it manually.
@jpstroop do we need to keep the bayonne mets / images? If so, where should they go?
@tpendragon Ah, yes, the image helps. You are quite right that this belongs to record 2051096. The other volumes probably do not belong to that record. It appears that this thing changed its name a lot. Volume 8 is from 1881, the record cover until 1882 and then it turns into record 2049799 until 1887 (up to probably issue 18) and then it turns into record 2045531 for volumes 19-49, so this should be the last record involved in this grouping.
These are ingested at https://figgy.princeton.edu/?f%5Bmember_of_collection_titles_ssim%5D%5B%5D=pudl0090
2 issues new issues for the loose ends here: https://github.com/pulibrary/figgy/issues/1719 https://github.com/pulibrary/figgy/issues/1718
Sorry, catching up. I think we should ingest Bayonne and just keep it private with a note.
On Wed, Aug 22, 2018, 8:27 PM hackmastera notifications@github.com wrote:
These are ingested at https://figgy.princeton.edu/?f%5Bmember_of_collection_titles_ssim%5D%5B%5D=pudl0090
2 issues new issues for the loose ends here:
1719 https://github.com/pulibrary/figgy/issues/1719
1718 https://github.com/pulibrary/figgy/issues/1718
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/pulibrary/figgy/issues/1609#issuecomment-415150046, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AA9BFSPKXA2KH8oh_auzG4zYHJQlm2K4ks5uTbCFgaJpZM4VktpX .
Notes: SHOULD WORK EXCEPT BAYONNE, which can't go up anyway.
@jpstroop @joycebcat What's "bayonne" and why can't it go up?