#Issue 66 - OK to merge

[sdellis]

@kevinreiss Is this along the lines of what you were thinking? (Still need to write the tests for this and allow URLs to be managed through a config file.)

[coveralls]

Coverage decreased (-22.4%) to 77.557% when pulling 2bca8c334a3f16321204b1b11c74d1501f5004b8 on issue-66 into 8e8c9b42ce6a1ad78676d89e364313ce1af43c2d on development.

[coveralls]

Coverage decreased (-22.4%) to 77.557% when pulling 2bca8c334a3f16321204b1b11c74d1501f5004b8 on issue-66 into 8e8c9b42ce6a1ad78676d89e364313ce1af43c2d on development.

[coveralls]

Coverage decreased (-7.9%) to 92.089% when pulling 1fc3aee30d2008bdd28ca782b99da82a04a1b2f8 on issue-66 into 8e8c9b42ce6a1ad78676d89e364313ce1af43c2d on development.

[coveralls]

Coverage decreased (-5.4%) to 94.562% when pulling 8911b495960624085f3ddfb3a8905b4064c4a16f on issue-66 into 8e8c9b42ce6a1ad78676d89e364313ce1af43c2d on development.

[coveralls]

Coverage decreased (-7.2%) to 92.814% when pulling ef3183c38502bc9e496d3602fff53c9df579e628 on issue-66 into 8e8c9b42ce6a1ad78676d89e364313ce1af43c2d on development.

[coveralls]

Coverage decreased (-6.9%) to 93.093% when pulling 5a9ded700f6fc2b14befd264cfc3e898f565659d on issue-66 into 8e8c9b42ce6a1ad78676d89e364313ce1af43c2d on development.

[coveralls]

Coverage decreased (-2.2%) to 97.84% when pulling 6d8004e95a8aaddc70b9d1cfb0db82e88608e372 on issue-66 into 8e8c9b42ce6a1ad78676d89e364313ce1af43c2d on development.

[coveralls]

Coverage decreased (-2.2%) to 97.84% when pulling 421584bf038093bee61b81ffa16074d978aca1f2 on issue-66 into 8e8c9b42ce6a1ad78676d89e364313ce1af43c2d on development.

[coveralls]

Coverage decreased (-1.9%) to 98.137% when pulling a99bfd33eb079d1f2fcfd5dd14265e2473461df0 on issue-66 into 8e8c9b42ce6a1ad78676d89e364313ce1af43c2d on development.

[coveralls]

Coverage decreased (-0.3%) to 99.689% when pulling 515240ae55b10fe0fc4aaeab727bc52eb8755f49 on issue-66 into 8e8c9b42ce6a1ad78676d89e364313ce1af43c2d on development.

[coveralls]

Coverage decreased (-1.2%) to 98.817% when pulling 88fadc6f204c4650c9079a7e52e3365aa6c3312a on issue-66 into 8e8c9b42ce6a1ad78676d89e364313ce1af43c2d on development.

[coveralls]

Coverage decreased (-0.6%) to 99.408% when pulling d6624cd34a57724ae2afdedec8c0f1498ea24b20 on issue-66 into 8e8c9b42ce6a1ad78676d89e364313ce1af43c2d on development.

[coveralls]

Coverage decreased (-0.3%) to 99.706% when pulling 247d91c441d51e07dd7a79158e5aceacd0275cb7 on issue-66 into 8e8c9b42ce6a1ad78676d89e364313ce1af43c2d on development.

[coveralls]

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling 7d4998a85b4f9edb7d3f329e7d74d8dc87cef780 on issue-66 into 8e8c9b42ce6a1ad78676d89e364313ce1af43c2d on development.

[coveralls]

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling bbdfd34d4abd6bdca6cb759a52dd9f563b594c29 on issue-66 into 8e8c9b42ce6a1ad78676d89e364313ce1af43c2d on development.

[coveralls]

Coverage decreased (-0.6%) to 99.413% when pulling c9f5a106ebc0a3ac7d6234909a733ed76943fd2e on issue-66 into 8e8c9b42ce6a1ad78676d89e364313ce1af43c2d on development.

[coveralls]

Coverage decreased (-0.6%) to 99.413% when pulling c9f5a106ebc0a3ac7d6234909a733ed76943fd2e on issue-66 into 8e8c9b42ce6a1ad78676d89e364313ce1af43c2d on development.

[tampakis]

Looks good to me, just need to get coverage to :100:

[coveralls]

Coverage decreased (-0.6%) to 99.413% when pulling e936d958048987d6ef41a89ab2c6d471d2cebdcf on issue-66 into 8e8c9b42ce6a1ad78676d89e364313ce1af43c2d on development.

[coveralls]

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling f899fbecb9bf525a6f2c07c0261e1faf8f64fbcb on issue-66 into 8e8c9b42ce6a1ad78676d89e364313ce1af43c2d on development.

[eliotjordan]

Pushed a few commits to this branch.

• The map model needed refactoring. In particular, the use of the self scope is not appropriate with instance methods and variables.
• Map controller spec was DRYed up.
• Added test for hours location. Coverage now 💯
• Map route converted to a resourceful route.
• Commit message streamlined.

[eliotjordan]

Closes issue #66.

[jpstroop]

:+1: nice