Open mubashir913 opened 6 days ago
Yes, this would be the better way to handle it indeed. https://github.com/pulp-platform/FlooNoC/pull/79 addresses this problem by inserting AXI error slaves in the network interfaces. But that PR is not yet ready to be merged.
Okay thanks.
I have generated a NoC using FlooNoC and encountered an issue during testing. When an AXI Master driver sends a request to a slave address that is not defined in the Slave Address Map (SAM), the NoC consistently forwards the request to a specific slave.
While the DECODE error assertion is correctly shown on the terminal, the response returned to the master has RESP = 0, because it is coming from a slave driver rather than being handled as an invalid address case.
Shouldn't the NoC handle such requests by not forwarding them to any slave and instead directly sending a response back to the master with RESP = 3 (DECERR), as per the AXI4 protocol?
P.S. In the
floo_route_comp
module, theen_default_idx_i
anddefault_idx_i
signals ofaddr_decode
module are set to 0.