search

pulp-platform / pulpissimo

This is the top-level project for the PULPissimo Platform. It instantiates a PULPissimo open-source system with a PULP SoC domain, but no cluster.
Other
386 stars 167 forks source link

frep-loop:Cannot select: intrinsic %llvm.riscv.frep.infer #401

Open zhayongquan opened 1 year ago

zhayongquan commented 1 year ago

When I compiled pulp-platform/llvm-project and pulp-platform/pulp-riscv-gnu-toolchain. I want to compile the .s file to view the assembly representation of the hardware cycle. The error message shows: fatal error: error in backend: Cannot select: intrinsic %llvm.riscv.frep.infer

bluewww commented 1 year ago

Please use https://github.com/pulp-platform/riscv-gnu-toolchain and report back.

The error you are indicating is something related to frep instructions. These are not available on PULPissimo but comes from our snitch based projects.

zhayongquan commented 1 year ago

When I used https://github.com/pulp-platform/riscv-gnu-toolchain to build the toolchain, the error still appears: fatal error: error in backend: Cannot select: intrinsic %llvm.riscv.frep.infer I wrote a simple loop test file test.c and added #pragma frep infer outside the loop. I wanted to see how the hardware loops behaves in the .s file. Or is there any other way to view the representation of hardware loop instructions down to assembly? Thank you so much.

bluewww commented 1 year ago

riscv-gnu-toolchain does not have frep it is anyway not supported on CV32 cores used in PULPissimo. You are not using riscv-gnu-toolchain its plainly obvious from the error message. LLVM is another compiler toolchain.

zhayongquan commented 11 months ago

If I use the LLVM compiler toolchain and want to see .c files containing loops lowering to assembly files like: lp.starti,lp.endi, lp.counti. I used https://github.com/pulp-platform/llvm-project, and https://github.com/pulp-platform/riscv-gnu-toolchain. The compilation .s command is: clang ./test.c --gcc-toolchain=/install-pulp-path --target=riscv32 -O2 -S -o test.s I would like to ask whether my method is wrong, or if some parameters are ignored by me, or The extended part of the hardware loop instruction is not used correctly? Thank you very much.