Closed manngo closed 1 year ago
Thanks for reporting this issue. Seems this is partially a duplicate of #88
But as that one hasn't been gotten to yet I appreciate you calling out this issue again. I've already created a PR to submit a fix for the warning given, and will take a look at the malformed data today hopefully. As that will require a manual edit to the database.
Essentially for a short period of time ( a few months ago I think) there was a bug that would incorrectly write data to the database when attempting to update a package. Which seems affected this one
So when investigating this to resolve the issue on the database, I've hit a bit of a roadblock.
The latest version the server has is web-developer-tools
version 0.4.4
but the repo manngo/atom-web-tools
only has up to version 0.4.0
.
Would you like me to reset the latest version on the backend to 0.4.0
? Otherwise I can fix the malformed data and have it point to 0.4.4
still but nobody will be able to install the package. @manngo how would you like to proceed?
Additionally you could manually publish a new 0.4.4
tag on GitHub and I can manually apply the fixes to use that as the latest on the database
With no response from the author, I've gone ahead and resolved this issue by falling back to 0.4.0
version of their package. Since there was no valid way to keep the 0.4.4
version as they had removed the tag from GitHub.
So I've deleted the now broken metadata for version 0.4.4
of their package, and fixed the metadata of their package as a whole. Since this was broken by a bug in the backend, the packages metadata has been fixed to properly include all associated data, taken from their GitHub repo.
Thanks for letting me know about this @manngo and hope this fix works for you.
I have a package from the old Atom days, which I have tried to migrate to Pulsar.
On my own setup I can’t update to the latest version, and when I try to view it on the https://web.pulsar-edit.dev/packages/ site I get the following message:
What is my next step?
PS I think there are two further issues with the message: the spelling of “severely” and the reference which (a) isn’t a link and (b) references
/issue
instead of/issues
.