Package `jupyter-notebook` should receive the broken badge

[confused-Techie]

Fails to install source

[confused-Techie]

Additionally, package omnisharp-atom should receive the broken badge

[Daeraxa]

Additionally, package omnisharp-atom should receive the broken badge

For reference: https://github.com/orgs/pulsar-edit/discussions/197, https://github.com/OmniSharp/omnisharp-atom/issues/1037

Seems to be unsupported by the maintainer (last update 6 years ago) but it seems there could be a valid workaround if somebody wanted to maintain a fork.

[goyalyashpal]

install source

source is discord requiring login - aka no public view. cn u summarise? thnx (:

[confused-Techie]

install source

source is discord requiring login - aka no public view. cn u summarise? thnx (:

I'll provide a transcription:

6lackcraft: BTW, just got an error on my jupyter notebook installation 6lackcraft: kinda weird, but my jupyter notebook plugin didn't build right apparently

confused-Techie: It wasn't so much not built correctly, looks like Pulsar is complaining about the JavaScript source itself. One thing to keep in mind is that with our upgrades to Electron/NodeJS Sloppy mode javascript is no longer allowed, meaning packages that use it will break. But I can't find evidence of that within the jupyter-notebook package. So I'm trying to see what's going on there.

6lackcraft: Thanks so much for taking the time to review that! Let me know how I can help. Is the error message indicative of a type in the source code? Failed to load the jupyter-notebook package

/home/mortal_engine/.pulsar/packages/jupyter-notebook/lib/main.js: Unexpected token, expected "," (36:4)
34 |         return el;
35 |       }
36 |     });
|     ^
37 |   },
38 |
39 |   deactivate() {

savetheclocktower: there's some JSX just above that line. i wonder if that's the problem because there's nothing wrong with the code at that position that i can tell well, this isn't a good sign: https://github.com/jupyter/atom-notebook/issues

6lackcraft: LOLOL!