Open anita-trimbur opened 1 year ago
@anita-trimbur can you update this issue since this has changed a bit?
@anita-trimbur ive been putting this off because i still don't feel good about calling the parent Documentation
since the label in the marketing nav and practitioner nav is Docs
. i think we have two options..
Docs
branding, even though its weird since part of docs is docsmy preference is 1 because i really think it ties it together. but what do you think? and are there any additional options we should consider?
did we ever hear back from marketing if they had an opinion on the naming convention here? i do think docs in docs is strange, but i agree with you that have some label is going to make this structure feel a lot more straightforward. would we be adding this parent name to the breadcrumb? unless we went back to using the <>
icon from the designs, that would give us a structure of Docs / Docs / ...
. but if we can circumvent that, i support option 1.
@anita-trimbur this change wont affect any breadcrumbs, it will only b e adding the badge to the top bar; i think we should wait to add <>
until the bigger decision is made. ill open a pr and me you and Sean can figure out if we want to do it from there.
i haven't heard anything from marketing. 🤷🏻
Overview
We're introducing sub-branding elements to the practitioner navigation (topmost black bar) in Docs & Registry. This parent "Documentation" branding will be a parent to all sub-categories of documentation in an effort to unify these experiences.
Design file
Figma preview
Changes
Style changes