Fix aws-ts-containers compilation

[t0yv0]

It appears that "name" property is required. This currently causes CI failure to compile typescript for this example.

https://github.com/pulumi/pulumi-awsx/blob/master/awsx/schema.json#L1208 is the reference.

https://github.com/pulumi/pulumi-awsx/pull/1069 is the change that made this required.

CC @rquitales @mjeffryes

[pulumi-staging[bot]]

:tropical_drink: The Update for moolumi/k8s-ci-cluster/3fc32749bdfe4a041bab3d0f7cb9ab18cd20c61a-1504 was successful.

Resource Changes

    Name                                                          Type                                        Operation
+   multicloud                                                    pulumi-kubernetes:ci:GkeCluster             create
+   password                                                      random:index/randomPassword:RandomPassword  create
+   ephemeral-ci-cluster                                          gcp:container/cluster:Cluster               create
+   primary-node-pool                                             gcp:container/nodePool:NodePool             create
+   gke                                                           pulumi:providers:kubernetes                 create
+   k8s-ci-cluster-3fc32749bdfe4a041bab3d0f7cb9ab18cd20c61a-1504  pulumi:pulumi:Stack                         create

[mjeffryes]

We've broken examples a few times recently when updating providers; We should probably be building examples when making providers releases? Alternatively, should the examples versions be pinned somehow and updated after the release goes out?

[pulumi-staging[bot]]

:tropical_drink: The Destroy for moolumi/k8s-ci-cluster/3fc32749bdfe4a041bab3d0f7cb9ab18cd20c61a-1504 was successful.

Resource Changes

    Name                  Type                                        Operation
-   gke                   pulumi:providers:kubernetes                 delete
-   primary-node-pool     gcp:container/nodePool:NodePool             delete
-   ephemeral-ci-cluster  gcp:container/cluster:Cluster               delete
-   password              random:index/randomPassword:RandomPassword  delete

[t0yv0]

We should probably be building examples when making providers releases

Well it's a possibility; it's going to be a draw on compute time but can help maintain this repo for sure.

The check failures are present on master independently yes.