pulumi / pulumi-packet

A Pulumi provider for Packet
Apache License 2.0
8 stars 4 forks source link

Rename Packet -> Equinix Metal #107

Open rawkode opened 3 years ago

rawkode commented 3 years ago

Hey!

I work for Equinix Metal, the cloud formerly known as Packet.

We're currently going through the process of renaming our APIs, assets, repositories; and we'd like this one to be inline with the rest and reflect our new brand.

We're happy to help, if we understand the best path forward for this.

Let me know your thoughts, please.

cc @stack72

thebsdbox commented 3 years ago

Howdy @stack72 / @viveklak is there anything we can do to get this rename moving along?

rawkode commented 3 years ago

I think a good first step could be to dual-publish this package on npm as @pulumi/equinix-metal, without any further changes.

Then we could begin to update beyond the superficial and iterate on the new package.

stack72 commented 3 years ago

Hey folks

We are not really setup to make any dual publishing therefore, this would simply be a cut over to a brand new provider that we would version as 1.0.0

Does that sound ok with you all?

P.

rawkode commented 3 years ago

@stack72 It's fine with me. I looked at the stats on npm and we're sitting at around 300 per week. The old @pulumi/packet package will still be available there, so we shouldn't break anything.

Could we do 1 final release to that package with a deprecation notice, before renaming to @pulumi/equinix-metal?

@thebsdbox @mrmrcoleman Are you both happy with @stack72's plan to rename and go 1.0.0?

rawkode commented 3 years ago

Cheers @stack72. Appreciate the help 👍🏻

thebsdbox commented 3 years ago

Im 💯 happy with the plan above :)

stack72 commented 3 years ago

Could we do 1 final release to that package with a deprecation notice, before renaming to @pulumi/equinix-metal?

I can add a top level comment to the README and give it a patch bump to get the details that the redirect has happened in the README - sound ok?

thebsdbox commented 3 years ago

This sounds OK to me. @stack72 when would we expect this to be completed?

rawkode commented 3 years ago

@thebsdbox This is waiting on https://github.com/packethost/terraform-provider-packet/pull/288

stack72 commented 3 years ago

Hi all

We have made a release with the new deprecation notice in the README - we are just waiting on ☝️

thebsdbox commented 3 years ago

Hello @stack72! as https://github.com/packethost/terraform-provider-packet/pull/288 is now merged? Are we in a place where this can be moved forwards?