Open rawkode opened 3 years ago
Howdy @stack72 / @viveklak is there anything we can do to get this rename moving along?
I think a good first step could be to dual-publish this package on npm as @pulumi/equinix-metal, without any further changes.
Then we could begin to update beyond the superficial and iterate on the new package.
Hey folks
We are not really setup to make any dual publishing therefore, this would simply be a cut over to a brand new provider that we would version as 1.0.0
Does that sound ok with you all?
P.
@stack72 It's fine with me. I looked at the stats on npm and we're sitting at around 300 per week. The old @pulumi/packet
package will still be available there, so we shouldn't break anything.
Could we do 1 final release to that package with a deprecation notice, before renaming to @pulumi/equinix-metal
?
@thebsdbox @mrmrcoleman Are you both happy with @stack72's plan to rename and go 1.0.0?
Cheers @stack72. Appreciate the help 👍🏻
Im 💯 happy with the plan above :)
Could we do 1 final release to that package with a deprecation notice, before renaming to
@pulumi/equinix-metal
?
I can add a top level comment to the README and give it a patch bump to get the details that the redirect has happened in the README - sound ok?
This sounds OK to me. @stack72 when would we expect this to be completed?
@thebsdbox This is waiting on https://github.com/packethost/terraform-provider-packet/pull/288
Hi all
We have made a release with the new deprecation notice in the README - we are just waiting on ☝️
Hello @stack72! as https://github.com/packethost/terraform-provider-packet/pull/288 is now merged? Are we in a place where this can be moved forwards?
Hey!
I work for Equinix Metal, the cloud formerly known as Packet.
We're currently going through the process of renaming our APIs, assets, repositories; and we'd like this one to be inline with the rest and reflect our new brand.
We're happy to help, if we understand the best path forward for this.
Let me know your thoughts, please.
cc @stack72