Closed janelu2 closed 8 years ago
@cprice404 @nathanielksmith
@cprice404 updated, lmk if that is what you were looking for?
+1 other than varname nitpick.
+1
@nathanielksmith any thoughts?
:+1:, only thought is wondering if we care about the async client? is that worth testing? or are the code paths so similar we can just test the sync client? (probs a question for @cprice404 )
:hankey: yeah, good call, it'd probably be a good idea to add analogs of these tests in the async test namespace.
+1 will merge after the trav
This PR adds a test to see if cookies are being correctly stored and accessible since there already exists support for cookies.