When using a log_level of 4/warn, corrective action occurs every puppet execution. From my testing it appears that iptables-save does not save the log level when the default value (4) is in use. As such, the firewall module does not read it in and thus fails its comparison.
Expected Behavior
When using the log_level of 4/warn, I expect no corrective actions to be taken.
Notice: /Stage[main]/Profile::Base::Firewall::Post/Firewall[998 log rejected input (v6)]/log_level: current_value , should be '4' (noop) (corrective)
Environment
Version:
module tag v8.0.2
puppet 8.6.0
RHEL7 iptables v1.4.21
RHEL9 iptables v1.8.8 (nf_tables)
Platform: RHEL7, RHEL9
Additional Context
Removing the log_level clears the issue up, however this is unintuitive. I've not looked at the iptables-save code so I'm not sure what 'other' default values it doesn't save. I'm also unsure whether this default is different between platforms.
Describe the Bug
When using a
log_level
of 4/warn
, corrective action occurs every puppet execution. From my testing it appears thatiptables-save
does not save the log level when the default value (4) is in use. As such, the firewall module does not read it in and thus fails its comparison.Expected Behavior
When using the
log_level
of 4/warn
, I expect no corrective actions to be taken.Steps to Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
Environment
Additional Context
Removing the
log_level
clears the issue up, however this is unintuitive. I've not looked at the iptables-save code so I'm not sure what 'other' default values it doesn't save. I'm also unsure whether this default is different between platforms.