01micko
commented
5 years ago Just change d="L to d="M
On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 9:26 PM PB notifications@github.com wrote:
Latest librsvg is 2.44.6 Slackware-14.2 and Ubuntu (BB & CC) are still using 2.40.20 Slackware-current has moved to 2.44.6 Besides the huge increase in size (2.40.20 <> 150KB; 2.44.6 <> 1.1MB) some (many?) hand crafted Puppy svg icons are not compatible with 2.44.x For instance:
https://github.com/puppylinux-woof-CE/woof-CE/blob/testing/woof-code/rootfs-packages/pt_buntoo/usr/share/jwm/themes_window_buttons/Buntu/close.svg does not work with 2.44.x (no cross is shown) and needs
replacing with something like:
i.e. the changes are not simple....or automatable.... So - Puppy either has to stay using 2.40.20 and current icons in which case 2.40.20 needs to be "captured" as .pet and put into common32 and common64 or all icons need to be reviewed and converted to a 2.44.x compatible format for the future.
@01micko https://github.com/01micko and @zigbert https://github.com/zigbert may wish to comment?
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/puppylinux-woof-CE/woof-CE/issues/1258, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AA-M76_9CqZGhe8WaYJbRpcVDgQHiO6Lks5ugKpygaJpZM4XA7zS .
wdlkmpx
peabee
Latest librsvg is 2.44.6 Slackware-14.2 and Ubuntu (BB & CC) are still using 2.40.20 Slackware-current has moved to 2.44.6 Besides the huge increase in size (2.40.20 <> 150KB; 2.44.6 <> 1.1MB) some (many?) hand crafted Puppy svg icons are not compatible with 2.44.x For instance: https://github.com/puppylinux-woof-CE/woof-CE/blob/testing/woof-code/rootfs-packages/pt_buntoo/usr/share/jwm/themes_window_buttons/Buntu/close.svg does not work with 2.44.x (no cross is shown) and needs
replacing with something like:
i.e. the changes are not simple....or automatable.... So - Puppy either has to stay using 2.40.20 and current icons in which case 2.40.20 needs to be "captured" as .pet and put into common32 and common64 or all icons need to be reviewed and converted to a 2.44.x compatible format for the future.
@01micko and @zigbert may wish to comment?