search

puppylinux-woof-CE / woof-CE

woof - the Puppy builder
GNU General Public License v2.0
396 stars 282 forks source link

Request for build database updates #1343

Open rserwin1 opened 5 years ago

rserwin1 commented 5 years ago

  1. In building bionic64 I saw a report of the findnrun_noarch-2.5.0 not being found. Only 2.4.0 is in the noarch repo; Packages-puppy-bionic64-official specifies 2.5.0. Could that inconsistency be resolved?

  2. Since pdiag is now in woofCE, it should be removed from DISTRO_PKGS_SPECS-ubuntu-bionic and similar files for the other distros, as well as from Packages-puppy-noarch-official. The woofCE version has an insignificant update beyond the repo pdiag.

  3. Pschedule-1.1.6 is in both Packages-puppy-noarch-official and woofCE. Should it be removed from Packages-puppy-noarch-official so that the woofCE copy is used in builds?

  4. Because redshiftgui-0.24 contains the content of woofCE's redshiftgui_wrapper package, the wrapper package probably can be deleted.

  5. Because redshiftgui-0.24 is appropriate for all puppies, should it not reside in repo pet_packages_common32 & common64, instead of each distro's petpackages..., and in the corresponding Packages-puppy-common*-official files? I probably do not know the rules for what goes where.

I am willing to make those changes, but assume the leaders would prefer to do it.

wdlkmpx commented 5 years ago

I also noticed mrfricks added noarch pkgs to bionic64.. as he always does. Maintining noarch involves monitoring the forum.

You might also want to contact 666phil privately, offering your help and notifying him about the changes you make, he's mostly unaware of what happens in the git repo.

You can ask peebee to upload packages. 01micko should give you write access to the git repos, but if he doesn't you might want to email him saying it's time. Mavorthal also seems to have admin rights.

noarch should be hosted in a git repo.. and the extracted packages (only scripts) should be in the same git repo, to perform some actions and operations

rserwin1 commented 5 years ago

Re: "noarch should be hosted in a git repo..", I am not sure what you mean by that. Are the distro.ibiblio.org/puppylinux/ directories git repos? I am not aware of repos other than those.

BTW, I added item 5 above before I noticed your prompt reply.

For now, I prefer to rely on peebee to make repo updates. But I am OK with making woof-distro updates, if you are. Assuming you feel I understand the rules for the updates.

wdlkmpx commented 5 years ago

I meant hosted by github, which only hosts git repos. But that's another issue. Another project.

I have no problem with the changes you want to make.

rserwin1 commented 5 years ago

Thank you.

mavrothal commented 5 years ago

@rserwin1 Is this issue still open?

rserwin1 commented 5 years ago

I guess it is, because I have not acted on it yet. I need to review the specifics. I conclude that my upgrade to "member" status at woofCE would allow me to make such changes. I understand that you have authorized me to do that.

mavrothal wrote:

@rserwin1 https://github.com/rserwin1 Is this issue still open?

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/puppylinux-woof-CE/woof-CE/issues/1343#issuecomment-471637903, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ASod5pU89jh_aRc9WI61WEAyL163fs5hks5vVpD6gaJpZM4bYDfb.