Closed lakshayrohila closed 5 months ago
@peabee, @dimkr, please review.
Not sure they're really needed..... but if only JammyPup64 is affected - no objection.
Not sure they're really needed..... but if only JammyPup64 is affected - no objection.
Not really required - Just few additional features (we are still trying to build an official Jammy64, right?)
I'd strongly recommend you not to add petbuilds for Python packages, unless you're 100% committed to maintaining them in the long term. They tend to be sensitive to the Python version. In this particular case, I wouldn't do this because I think the benefit is not worth it - documentation beyond man pages is easy to find online and I think the extra size and maintenance cost is not worth it.
I'd strongly recommend you not to add petbuilds for Python packages, unless you're 100% committed to maintaining them in the long term.
Actually, 0% committed for maintenance :-1:.
They tend to be sensitive to the Python version. In this particular case, I wouldn't do this because I think the benefit is not worth it - documentation beyond man pages is easy to find online and I think the extra size and maintenance cost is not worth it.
Well, I also agree with this. Thanks for the information and the advice!
I'll close the PR.
This commit adds
tldr-py
(petbuild) andbtop
to Jammy64 on Clarity's request here.It also introduces two petbuilds:
tldr-py
andpython3-shtab
(the latter being a dependency oftldr-py
petbuild).I wanted to use
tldr-py
instead of the regulartldr
because the packagetldr
is quite large as it has dependencies such asgit
. There is also atldr-py
Ubuntu package, but in Jammy, this one was quite old and, IMHO, not very user-friendly.python3-shtab
petbuild was required to be added because it is not available in Ubuntu Jammy's repos (it started with Ubuntu Lunar).