Closed matthewleon closed 6 years ago
Sounds like a useful addition!
What about calling this digitsInBase
(and digits = digitsInBase 10
) or similar?
What about calling this digitsInBase (and digits = digitsInBase 10) or similar?
I like that.
Closed via #17.
@matthewleon Let me know if you want me to release a new version.
Yes please. Thanks!
On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 at 02:46, David Peter notifications@github.com wrote:
@matthewleon https://github.com/matthewleon Let me know if you want me to release a new version.
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/sharkdp/purescript-bigints/issues/16#issuecomment-374115871, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AARBS111Mv65RZxbPc5k_RETC2JXDx7Cks5tf1Q3gaJpZM4Sn1uR .
Awesome! Thanks!
On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 at 16:12, David Peter notifications@github.com wrote:
Done: https://pursuit.purescript.org/packages/purescript-bigints/3.5.0
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/sharkdp/purescript-bigints/issues/16#issuecomment-374355713, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AARBS831VqMJmefU4cOwR3EvdqpmB26xks5tgBESgaJpZM4Sn1uR .
I propose
toBaseArray :: Int -> BigInt -> NonEmptyArray Int
.