Open garyb opened 3 years ago
I think the most sensible thing is to have two libraries, and I think it's sensible to do it now, given that we'd be shuffling some definitions among packages as part of that change and we're already in the midst of making breaking changes for 0.14. @keijokapp has some initial work on a cssom-view
specific package here:
Yeah, I just saw the other conversation that mentioned that, right as you replied!
It recently came to my attention that there are two very similar named specs, and we have a mixture of both in here 🤦♂️. We could just say that this library covers both of them... but they do kinda have separate concerns:
https://www.w3.org/TR/cssom-1/
https://www.w3.org/TR/cssom-view-1/