Closed JordanMartinez closed 2 years ago
PRs to pulp
to support ES modules are ready for review:
pulp
to GH Actions: https://github.com/purescript-contrib/pulp/pull/399pulp
to work on v0.15.0 PS version: https://github.com/purescript-contrib/pulp/pull/401CI builds now :tada:
The alpha-02
release is now on GH. Restarting CI to verify this PR still builds.
CI builds on the alpha-02
release.
We need to be careful that setup-purescript
has auto-updated to the latest unstable release before re-running CI. For example, it's still on alpha-01
:
and so that re-run of CI pulled in the old purs:
Cached path /opt/hostedtoolcache/purs/0.15.0-alpha-01/x64, adding to PATH
I've restarted the sync versions job there so that it updates the file and then we can re-run CI here.
Ah, good catch.
This looks good to me other than the discussion around the eslint configuration.
@JordanMartinez Is it acceptable to delete the es-modules-libraries branch, or does it need to be kept around for the sake of upstream packages?
The working-group-purescript-es/package-set#main
should be using the es-modules
branch still, but pulp@16.0.0-0
would still try to install the branch via pulp ini
. So, perhaps we should hold off until a pulp@16.0.0-1
can be released that just installs master
from the core repo, not the es-modules-libraries
branch from the working group repo?
Description of the change
Backlinking to purescript/purescript#4244
Migrates FFI to ES modules. This continues what was started in #284 but using a different branch named
es-modules-libraries
to ensure further development on the compiler isn't affected by commits pushed to this PR.This PR also succeeds #264 since that PR was not opened by the 'working-group-purescript-es' org, which allows multiple people to push to the PR if the original submitter is gone for while.
This PR will fail to build until
pulp
has been updated to support ES modules when one callspulp run
andpulp test
. See https://github.com/purescript-contrib/pulp/issues/400 for more info.Checklist: