Closed luismfonseca closed 4 years ago
@marekoid as discussed in person: the assumption on where the null pointer was, was correct but I've added a test to test it explicitly. With regards to the overly-defensive code, I've remove the extraneous return null
for cases we don't expect and added the global try .. catch()
.
Closing this one out as we've decided to keep #98.
Why?
We had a customer report with the following stack trace:
I'm not sure when this can happen, but these operations are best-effort, so we should fail silently if something is occasionally wrong for some reason.