Currently we have "Singular" variant of packages naming, for example: com.pushtorefresh.stroio.sqlite.operation, but in fact it contains several Operations and it'll be more correctly to name it com.pushtorefresh.stroio.sqlite.operations.
Also, we will have more cool artifact for sqlite-annotations:
Before: compile 'com.pushtorefresh.storio:sqlite-annotation:+'
After: compile 'com.pushtorefresh.storio:sqlite-annotations:+' // in fact, there are several annotations
Hope it's last issue before
1.0.0
.Package naming policy:
http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/75919/should-package-names-be-singular-or-plural
Currently we have "Singular" variant of packages naming, for example:
com.pushtorefresh.stroio.sqlite.operation
, but in fact it contains several Operations and it'll be more correctly to name itcom.pushtorefresh.stroio.sqlite.operations
.Also, we will have more cool artifact for
sqlite-annotations
:Before:
compile 'com.pushtorefresh.storio:sqlite-annotation:+'
After:compile 'com.pushtorefresh.storio:sqlite-annotations:+' // in fact, there are several annotations
@nikitin-da your thoughts?