Open jorgebay opened 1 year ago
Hi Jorge,
I'm all for a contribution. COW data structures are on the radar and I have a COW list issue open (#27), but there wasn't enough interest for it, unfortunately. In MapOf
, LoadOrCompute()
's read path assumes two atomic loads in the best case. So the end COW map performance might be close to MapOf
, but it's certainly worth exploring.
I agree that the improvement on the performance side for read-mostly cases is minor.
I think the main benefit is related to the consistent snapshot semantics: iterate a point-in-time structure, e.g., if you have a map with [a, b, c]
keys that get mutated into [a, b, d, e]
the caller will never get [a, b, d]
.
I think the main benefit is related to the consistent snapshot semantics
Yes, that's not possible with non-COW or single mutex protected data structures.
(First of all, cool project @puzpuzpuz! A faster and typed concurrent map like
MapOf
is something that should be part of go's stdlib)Copy-on-write maps are useful for read-mostly performance-critical areas, as
LoadOrCompute()
calls only cost an atomic load for reads. Additionally, these semantics provide a snapshot view that allow fast and predictable iteration.Typical use cases for these structures are config settings and topology management.
I can contribute it, if you think it belongs in this project.