Closed pwightman closed 12 years ago
I liked it better. I don't know if there was any particular reason.
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Parker < reply@reply.github.com
wrote:
Can someone remind me again why we're using createNfa instead of just using an overloaded Nfa constructor?
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/pwightman/nfa_evaluator/issues/1
Fair enough.
I had a reason, I just can't remember it. I think it made something easier somehow...
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 4:10 PM, Michael Hogenson mah.general@gmail.comwrote:
I liked it better. I don't know if there was any particular reason.
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Parker < reply@reply.github.com
wrote:
Can someone remind me again why we're using createNfa instead of just using an overloaded Nfa constructor?
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/pwightman/nfa_evaluator/issues/1
I remember something about how we wanted to make the default, no-argument constructor private so people can't create an Nfa's without supplying all the parameters. But I don't remember why it was advantageous over an overloaded constructor. I'm fine with keeping it if you prefer it, I just wondered.
Can someone remind me again why we're using createNfa instead of just using an overloaded Nfa constructor?