Open pwjj2000 opened 1 year ago
No details provided by team.
[The team marked this bug as a duplicate of the following bug]
Insufficient glossary in both UG and DG
Note from the teaching team: This bug was reported during the Part II (Evaluating Documents) stage of the PE. You may reject this bug if it is not related to the quality of documentation.
For DGFor UG
Explainations used are insufficient and not clear
In both cases there are many jargons used such as API or Syntax which a teacher would simply not understand. More needs to be explained so that reader would have clearer understanding of documents.
[original: nus-cs2103-AY2223S1/pe-interim#2996] [original labels: type.DocumentationBug severity.Low]
[This is the team's response to the above 'original' bug]
No details provided by team.
Items for the Tester to Verify
:question: Issue duplicate status
Team chose to mark this issue as a duplicate of another issue (as explained in the Team's response above)
Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]
Team chose [severity.Low
]
Originally [severity.Medium
]
Reason for disagreement: I still think that the lack of explanation of certain terms and abbreviations used cause more than just a 'minor inconvenience' to readers. Abbreviations like MSS can stand for many things. A Google search on "MSS abbreviation" does not yield results even close to "Main Success Scenario".
Examples: MSS