Closed bradyrx closed 5 years ago
Okay, this was tested in 60to30km with all BGC sensors turned on (i.e. DIC, ALK, PO4, NO3, SiO3, NH4, Fe, O2). It ran just fine, so I think this is ready to be merged.
/lustre/scratch3/turquoise/rileybrady/ACME/cases/GMPAS-OECO-ODMS-IAF.T62_oEC60to30v3.grizzly.9600o.128i.5ParticleLayers.Toff.Soff.DICon.ALKon.PO4on.NO3on.SiO3on.NH4on.Feon.O2on/run
On Monday I will run this branch (or the main one if both PR's are merged) on our coarsened 30to10 production run to figure out performance.
@pwolfram, c5320aa69de3cb60589ce08e4a5791e8479196dd fixes the segfault issue we saw in https://github.com/pwolfram/MPAS-Model/pull/21. Feel free to cherry pick to that branch, if that's the appropriate path forward for something like this.
Simulation runs just fine on IC with DIC/ALK sensors following c5320aa69de3cb60589ce08e4a5791e8479196dd:
I figured I would add a few commits here to follow up https://github.com/pwolfram/MPAS-Model/pull/21 with capability for the remaining passive tracers (e.g. NO3, PO4). Let me know if this sounds right.
Following this, I can run some timing tests for our 30to10 production run.