Closed AlterEgogo closed 4 months ago
Application is waiting for allocator review
Hello, @AlterEgogo, could you please send your KYC information to yu.leng@guazi.io?Thank you!
@Fatman13 Thanks for the reply, have arranged for a colleague to send an email, please check. Thank you.
Thanks for the reply, have arranged for a colleague to send an email, please check. Thank you.
Thank you! I see that you have updated data type and couple other things in the application. Could you please send more sample data and KYB for evaluation to yu.leng@guazi.io? We are open to sign NDAs to protect your privacy.
@Fatman13 Ok, I have attached our business licence to the email so you can check it out! Thank you!
LGTM! Will approve. Please remember to follow allocator distribution rules specified in here. Thank you!
Total DataCap requested
2PiB
Expected weekly DataCap usage rate
500TiB
DataCap Amount - First Tranche
2PiB
Client address
f1iyihonsjs44ke5ftorilthinv22s3bjvzkv2v3i
f1iyihonsjs44ke5ftorilthinv22s3bjvzkv2v3i
2PiB
4ff9c335-fc91-4fd2-90e3-b5492532db0a
Application is ready to sign
Your Datacap Allocation Request has been approved by the Notary
bafy2bzacedm5gyuvuxhvkmlwkzqlup2oflaqiggtjtvq5vuwqgf4uwvbssmgi
Address
f1iyihonsjs44ke5ftorilthinv22s3bjvzkv2v3i
Datacap Allocated
2PiB
Signer Address
f1j3u7crhjzwb2cj5mq7vodlt4o66yoyci7lhcauy
Id
4ff9c335-fc91-4fd2-90e3-b5492532db0a
You can check the status of the message here: https://filfox.info/en/message/bafy2bzacedm5gyuvuxhvkmlwkzqlup2oflaqiggtjtvq5vuwqgf4uwvbssmgi
Application is Granted
checker:manualTrigger
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
⚠️ 75.00% of Storage Providers have retrieval success rate equal to zero.
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
✔️ No CID sharing has been observed.
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the CID Checker report.
Distribution looks okay from the CID checker report.
Application is Completed
checker:manualTrigger
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
⚠️ 75.00% of Storage Providers have retrieval success rate equal to zero.
⚠️ The average retrieval success rate is 12.90%
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
⚠️ CID sharing has been observed. (Top 3)
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the CID Checker report.
checker:manualTrigger
Hello, dear applicant, from the CID report, i see that there is CID sharing is observed by the bot. Is there a mixup happened during distribution?
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
⚠️ 75.00% of Storage Providers have retrieval success rate equal to zero.
⚠️ The average retrieval success rate is 12.92%
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
⚠️ CID sharing has been observed. (Top 3)
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the CID Checker report.
@Fatman13 From the sharing records it is seen that there are data sharing LDNs as far back as 2022, unfortunately and apologetically we did not find a data sharing issue after querying the issue with the data. This is because we were not able to download the data from another LDN for comparison. The only possible explanation for the data consistency issue is that the 32 gigabytes of data may have been sourced from public data by both us and the company.
Got it. Thank you!
checker:manualTrigger
✔️ Storage provider distribution looks healthy.
⚠️ 62.50% of Storage Providers have retrieval success rate equal to zero.
⚠️ 100.00% of Storage Providers have retrieval success rate less than 75%.
⚠️ The average retrieval success rate is 1.38%
✔️ Data replication looks healthy.
⚠️ CID sharing has been observed. (Top 3)
[^1]: To manually trigger this report, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger
[^2]: Deals from those addresses are combined into this report as they are specified with checker:manualTrigger
[^3]: To manually trigger this report with deals from other related addresses, add a comment with text checker:manualTrigger <other_address_1> <other_address_2> ...
Click here to view the CID Checker report.
Data Owner Name
The Second Life
Data Owner Country/Region
China
Data Owner Industry
IT & Technology Services
Website
https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/IMtL_m4sQAxqCmNWlw28Gw
Social Media Handle
https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/IMtL_m4sQAxqCmNWlw28Gw
Social Media Type
WeChat
What is your role related to the dataset
Dataset Owner
Total amount of DataCap being requested
2PiB
Expected size of single dataset (one copy)
300TiB
Number of replicas to store
7
Weekly allocation of DataCap requested
500TiB
On-chain address for first allocation
f1iyihonsjs44ke5ftorilthinv22s3bjvzkv2v3i
Data Type of Application
Private Commercial/Enterprise
Custom multisig
Identifier
No response
Share a brief history of your project and organization
Is this project associated with other projects/ecosystem stakeholders?
No
If answered yes, what are the other projects/ecosystem stakeholders
No response
Describe the data being stored onto Filecoin
Where was the data currently stored in this dataset sourced from
My Own Storage Infra
If you answered "Other" in the previous question, enter the details here
No response
If you are a data preparer. What is your location (Country/Region)
China
If you are a data preparer, how will the data be prepared? Please include tooling used and technical details?
If you are not preparing the data, who will prepare the data? (Provide name and business)
No response
Has this dataset been stored on the Filecoin network before? If so, please explain and make the case why you would like to store this dataset again to the network. Provide details on preparation and/or SP distribution.
Please share a sample of the data
Confirm that this is a public dataset that can be retrieved by anyone on the Network
If you chose not to confirm, what was the reason
No response
What is the expected retrieval frequency for this data
Yearly
For how long do you plan to keep this dataset stored on Filecoin
2 to 3 years
In which geographies do you plan on making storage deals
Greater China, North America
How will you be distributing your data to storage providers
HTTP or FTP server, IPFS
How did you find your storage providers
Slack
If you answered "Others" in the previous question, what is the tool or platform you used
No response
Please list the provider IDs and location of the storage providers you will be working with.
How do you plan to make deals to your storage providers
Boost client, Lotus client
If you answered "Others/custom tool" in the previous question, enter the details here
No response
Can you confirm that you will follow the Fil+ guideline
Yes