Website: ensure packaging guide, questions, and review content is carried over

[kierisi]

In Enh: new volunteer page I left the comment:

Of note - there is information on the existing volunteer page that isn't on this one. I believe it's accounted for in our updated site map!

This refers to the following:

• On the original Get Involved page there were three cards at the top of the page:
  • Got a Packaging Question?
  • Submit a Scientific Python Package for Review
  • Review our Packaging Guide

TODO: ensure this information is reflected elsewhere on the site. Based on our current sitemap it looks like we have this information planned for our homepage.

The full text of the omitted section is as follows:

Connect with us through peer review and Python packaging!

Got a Packaging Question? If you are a scientist and have a question about packaging, our discourse forum is the place for you. We have volunteers from the pip and conda / conda-forge packaging ecosystem that can help you find the answers that you need. You can also ask questions about peer review there. Button: Ask a packaging question now

Submit a Scientific Python Package for Review Are you developing or maintaining a scientific Python package that is in scope for our peer review process? If so, consider submitting it for peer review. We partner with JOSS so you can submit to us and JOSS will accept our review as theirs. They then just review your paper. It’s a win/win! Check out our author guide to learn more about the process. Pro-tip: If you still aren’t sure if your package is in scope for us, you can submit a pre-submission inquiry. Button: Submit a package now

Review our Packaging Guide Let’s face it, we all make mistakes. Our community-driven Python packaging guide goes through extensive community review however there are still always typos to be found. If you find a typo in any of our guides (or on this website), we welcome big, small or somewhere in between sized pull requests on GitHub to fix any typos or grammatical errors. If you find something that seems incorrect or you’re not quite ready to submit a pull request we also welcome issues identifying the problem! Button: Check out our Python packaging guide online

[willingc]

@kierisi Let's review this issue to see if it is still relevant. If it is, let's leave a message with next step needed. Thanks.

[lwasser]

gosh @kierisi i did remember that we removed some of this content. I'm not sure we need to add it back. maybe you remember more about this issue than i do? if not let's close it. :)

[kierisi]

@lwasser if you're fine with removing it then I'm OK with closing the issue!

[lwasser]

thank you @kierisi !!