pyOpenSci / software-submission

Submit your package for review by pyOpenSci here! If you have questions please post them here: https://pyopensci.discourse.group/
92 stars 36 forks source link

Submission: easysklearn (Python) #35

Closed hellosakshi closed 3 years ago

hellosakshi commented 3 years ago

Submitting Author: Name (@github_handle)

Package Name: easysklearn

One-Line Description of Package: A python package to explore data, to select features, to impute missing data and to select the model

Repository Link: https://github.com/UBC-MDS/524_easysklearn

Version submitted:
Editor: TBD
Reviewer 1: TBD
Reviewer 2: TBD
Archive: TBD
Version accepted: TBD


Description

Easysklearn is a python package designed to perform exploratory data analysis, to help with missing data imputation and to give baseline models. Also, it assists in feature selection which is a common problem when undertaking a data science or machine learning analysis.

Scope

* Please fill out a pre-submission inquiry before submitting a data visualization package. For more info, see notes on categories of our guidebook.

Technical checks

For details about the pyOpenSci packaging requirements, see our packaging guide. Confirm each of the following by checking the box. This package:

Publication options

JOSS Checks - [ ] The package has an **obvious research application** according to JOSS's definition in their [submission requirements][JossSubmissionRequirements]. Be aware that completing the pyOpenSci review process **does not** guarantee acceptance to JOSS. Be sure to read their submission requirements (linked above) if you are interested in submitting to JOSS. - [ ] The package is not a "minor utility" as defined by JOSS's [submission requirements][JossSubmissionRequirements]: "Minor ‘utility’ packages, including ‘thin’ API clients, are not acceptable." pyOpenSci welcomes these packages under "Data Retrieval", but JOSS has slightly different criteria. - [ ] The package contains a `paper.md` matching [JOSS's requirements][JossPaperRequirements] with a high-level description in the package root or in `inst/`. - [ ] The package is deposited in a long-term repository with the DOI: *Note: Do not submit your package separately to JOSS*

Are you OK with Reviewers Submitting Issues and/or pull requests to your Repo Directly?

This option will allow reviewers to open smaller issues that can then be linked to PR's rather than submitting a more dense text based review. It will also allow you to demonstrate addressing the issue via PR links.

Code of conduct

P.S. *Have feedback/comments about our review process? Leave a comment here

Editor and Review Templates

Editor and review templates can be found here

hellosakshi commented 3 years ago

I posted here by mistake

NickleDave commented 3 years ago

Hi @hellosakshi could I ask where you meant to post?

We've had multiple people open and then close issues in the last couple of days.

I'm just trying to figure out if someone might be directing people here by accident?

Thank you

NickleDave commented 3 years ago

Never mind I think I figured out! :)

https://github.com/UBC-MDS/software-review-2021

Happy to provide material so you all can get practice submitting for review

hellosakshi commented 3 years ago

Glad you resolved the mystery:)

lwasser commented 3 years ago

i've noticed this too. is this from Tiffany's course?

NickleDave commented 3 years ago

yes, I think so -- I checked their org page and can see that some of the same packages were added there. Probably just a little bit of a misunderstanding

I mean more than one sounded like I actually wanted them to be submitted