Closed lwasser closed 6 months ago
Hey @lwasser :wave: welcome to pyOpenSci’s scientific Python peer review process!
We’ve seen your message. Someone from our editorial team will get back to you within the next week about this submission. In the meantime, feel free to check out our packaging guide or feel free to ask questions on our Discourse forum.
@pyosbot assign eic: @lwasser
I'm sorry human, I don't understand that. You can see what commands I support by typing:
@pyosbot help
@pyosbot assign eic
@pyosbot assignee: @lwasser
I'm sorry human, I don't understand that. You can see what commands I support by typing:
@pyosbot help
@pyosbot add assignee: @lwasser
@lwasser added as assignee.
@pyosbot add @chayadecacao as editor
Assigned! @chayadecacao is now the editor
@pyosbot add @chayadecacao as editor
Assigned! @chayadecacao is now the editor
now seeing if editor assignee works if no assignee is there?
@pyosbot remove assignee: @lwasser
@pyosbot remove assignee: @lwasser
@lwasser removed from assignees.
@pyosbot remove editor
Editor removed!
@pyosbot assign editor @chayadecacao
I'm sorry human, I don't understand that. You can see what commands I support by typing:
@pyosbot help
@pyosbot assigne @chayadecacao as editor
I'm sorry human, I don't understand that. You can see what commands I support by typing:
@pyosbot help
@pyosbot assign @chayadecacao as editor
Assigned! @chayadecacao is now the editor
chayadecacao is not added as an assignee but added as an editor. so it's partially working as expected.
@pyosbot add @chayadecacao as collaborator
I'm sorry human, I don't understand that. You can see what commands I support by typing:
@pyosbot help
@pyosbot seeking-reviewers
I'm sorry human, I don't understand that. You can see what commands I support by typing:
@pyosbot help
@pyosbot help
Hello @lwasser, here are the things you can ask me to do:
# List all available commands
@pyosbot help
# Show our community Code of Conduct and Guidelines
@pyosbot code of conduct
# Allow editors to move the review to EiC checks
@pyosbot assign eic
# Get a list of all editors's GitHub handles
@pyosbot list editors
# Assign a user as the editor of this submission
@pyosbot assign @username as editor
# Remove the editor assigned to this submission
@pyosbot remove editor
# Add to this issue's reviewers list
@pyosbot add @reviewer-login as reviewer
# Remove from this issue's reviewers list
@pyosbot remove @reviewer-login from reviewers
# Add review checklist for a user
@pyosbot add checklist for @username
# Remove the checklist for a user
@pyosbot remove checklist for @username
# Add review checklist for a user
@pyosbot add checklist for @username
# Remove the checklist for a user
@pyosbot remove checklist for @username
# Label issue with: 2/seeking-reviewers. Remove labels: 1/editor-assigned
@pyosbot seeking reviewers
# Label issue with: 3/reviewer(s)-assigned. Remove labels: 2/seeking-reviewers
@pyosbot reviewers assigned
# Label issue with: 4/review-in-awaiting-changes. Remove labels: 3/reviewer(s)-assigned
@pyosbot reviews are in
# Label issue with: 5/awaiting-reviewer-response. Remove labels: 4/review-in-awaiting-changes
@pyosbot author response complete
# Set a value for version
@pyosbot set v1.0.0 as version
# Set a value for archive
@pyosbot set 10.5281/zenodo.7158585 as archive
# Remind an author, a reviewer or the editor to return to a review after a
# certain period of time (supported units days and weeks)
@pyosbot remind @reviewer in 2 weeks
@pyosbot seeking reviewers
@pyosbot assign editor @lwasser
I'm sorry human, I don't understand that. You can see what commands I support by typing:
@pyosbot help
@pyosbot assign @lwasser as editor
Assigned! @lwasser is now the editor
@pyosbot assign @chayadecacao as editor
Assigned! @chayadecacao is now the editor
@pyosbot assign @lwasser as editor
Assigned! @lwasser is now the editor
@pyosbot assign @chayadecacao as editor
Assigned! @chayadecacao is now the editor
@pyosbot seeking reviewers
@pyosbot add @lwasser as reviewer
@lwasser added to the reviewers list!
@pyosbot add @chayadecacao as reviewer
@chayadecacao added to the reviewers list!
@pyosbot reviewers assigned
@pyosbot editor response
I'm sorry human, I don't understand that. You can see what commands I support by typing:
@pyosbot help
@pyosbot help
Submitting Author: Juno Dog (@chayadecacao ) All current maintainers: (@github_handle1, @github_handle2) Package Name: Package name here One-Line Description of Package: Description here Repository Link: Version submitted: Editor: !--editor-->@chayadecacao<!--end-editor--
Reviewers: @lwasser, @chayadecacao
Archive: TBD JOSS DOI: TBD Version accepted: TBD
Date accepted (month/day/year): TBD
Code of Conduct & Commitment to Maintain Package
Description
Scope
Please indicate which category or categories. Check out our package scope page to learn more about our scope. (If you are unsure of which category you fit, we suggest you make a pre-submission inquiry):
Domain Specific
Community Partnerships
If your package is associated with an existing community please check below:
For all submissions, explain how the and why the package falls under the categories you indicated above. In your explanation, please address the following points (briefly, 1-2 sentences for each):
Who is the target audience and what are scientific applications of this package?
Are there other Python packages that accomplish the same thing? If so, how does yours differ?
If you made a pre-submission enquiry, please paste the link to the corresponding issue, forum post, or other discussion, or
@tag
the editor you contacted:Technical checks
For details about the pyOpenSci packaging requirements, see our packaging guide. Confirm each of the following by checking the box. This package:
Publication Options
JOSS Checks
- [ ] The package has an **obvious research application** according to JOSS's definition in their [submission requirements][JossSubmissionRequirements]. Be aware that completing the pyOpenSci review process **does not** guarantee acceptance to JOSS. Be sure to read their submission requirements (linked above) if you are interested in submitting to JOSS. - [ ] The package is not a "minor utility" as defined by JOSS's [submission requirements][JossSubmissionRequirements]: "Minor ‘utility’ packages, including ‘thin’ API clients, are not acceptable." pyOpenSci welcomes these packages under "Data Retrieval", but JOSS has slightly different criteria. - [ ] The package contains a `paper.md` matching [JOSS's requirements][JossPaperRequirements] with a high-level description in the package root or in `inst/`. - [ ] The package is deposited in a long-term repository with the DOI: *Note: JOSS accepts our review as theirs. You will NOT need to go through another full review. JOSS will only review your paper.md file. Be sure to link to this pyOpenSci issue when a JOSS issue is opened for your package. Also be sure to tell the JOSS editor that this is a pyOpenSci reviewed package once you reach this step.*Are you OK with Reviewers Submitting Issues and/or pull requests to your Repo Directly?
This option will allow reviewers to open smaller issues that can then be linked to PR's rather than submitting a more dense text based review. It will also allow you to demonstrate addressing the issue via PR links.
Confirm each of the following by checking the box.
Please fill out our survey
P.S. Have feedback/comments about our review process? Leave a comment here
Editor and Review Templates
The editor template can be found here.
The review template can be found here.
Review checklist for @lwasser
🎉 has been approved by pyOpenSci! Thank you for submitting and many thanks to for reviewing this package! 😸
Author Wrap Up Tasks
There are a few things left to do to wrap up this submission:
[![pyOpenSci](https://tinyurl.com/y22nb8up)](https://github.com/pyOpenSci/software-review/issues/issue-number)
.