Integrators

[mottosso]

For the 1.1, as is being discussed in the Usergroup, we're thinking about renaming Conformer to Integrator.

This issue is part of the 1.1 "milestone". Let's tag each issue relevant to the 1.1 with this milestone, that way, we can spot progress and keep track of exactly what we are up against.

[mottosso]

This has been implemented in the form of an alias, since 1.0.1.

import pyblish.api as pyblish

class IntegrateAsset(pyblish.Integrator):
  ...

However bear in mind that the physical files will still need to be named conform_.

Considering whether both should be allowed?

# E.g.
conform_asset.py
integrate_asset.py

[tokejepsen]

I'm actually warming to conforming:)

[mottosso]

:)

[mkolar]

I quite like conform too. But quite frankly renaming it doesn't bother me in the slightest. Both work equally good as far as I can tell.

[mottosso]

Just to clarify, there won't be any renaming. This would simply add another option to how you are able to name the files on disk. Either prefixed with conform_ or integrate_ depending on your preference.

You could potentially use both, depending on whether one suits better than the other.

conform_images.py
integrate_asset.py

[mottosso]

Implemented in 1.1