Closed darkvertex closed 6 years ago
Sounds like a good feature. Maybe "category" is a better term?
Hey @darkvertex , I made a PR for this feature to try out :) Have a look !
@tokejepsen I agree with you, "category" sounds more proper.
@davidlatwe: Took a look and it seems perfect from my point of view. 👍
Implemented :)
Hello! Tell me if you think this might be a good idea:
Currently
pyblish-qml
groups instances by family. In most cases this is fine, but what if it was possible to designate an instance data member for overriding that? A "display group", if you will.I have a few publishers which involve one or more individual mandatory publishes and then optionally can publish a number of assets or things in the scene. It's working, but I find it a bit ugly for the singular instances to be alone in their own collapsible tab. (I'd prefer if they were all together, but I don't want to give them all the same family as I have plugins to target specific families and that would defeat the purpose of targeting plugins by family.)
If I could assign them a "display group" string which would indicate what tab they'd go under, I think that would work best for such cases, and if none given, I'd expect the default present behaviour of grouping by family.
Thoughts?