Closed EmilyBourne closed 1 year ago
@bauom this PR passes codacy's checks. It seems that they are not correctly reported because this is a fork and the head has not been checked by codacy on this repo. After you accept the PR I will force merge it to get around this problem
Merging #1 (70a9590945684f7fc6e9c9cdfcd0bdfb09600a4c) into master
(b0ad67408039d8598d89f1f464dc162913588b68) - See PR on Codacy
Coverage variation | Diff coverage |
---|---|
-0.72% | ∅ |
That is correct. The branch
master
will be the equivalent ofcuda_main
,development
will be the equivalent ofcuda_dev
. If you haven't added anything tocuda_dev
yet then yes the next stage is to mergecuda_main_temp
intocuda_main