Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
I think you are benchmarking actually mplayer in this case (which is used by
gnome-mplayer, but not part of it). I have done some performance testing of just
gnome-mplayer and I think it uses the machine pretty lightly.
Original comment by kdeko...@gmail.com
on 20 Sep 2009 at 2:24
You're missing the point; the fact remains that gnome-mplayer takes more CPU
time (2x
on my system) to play a video than does straight mplayer or even vlc.
The oprofile data I provided suggests that the relationship between
gnome-mplayer and
mplayer has fairly significant overhead because data must be copied around more
than
the computation itself actually requires.
Original comment by mfwit...@gmail.com
on 21 Sep 2009 at 12:26
Does top show this? And yes I have done benchmarking on my machine and what I
have
observed is usually a 1% overhead with using gnome-mplayer with mplayer. The
video
output you chose can drastically affect these numbers so make sure you are
using the
same values in both tests.
Original comment by kdeko...@gmail.com
on 21 Sep 2009 at 12:45
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
mfwit...@gmail.com
on 19 Sep 2009 at 9:14