Add list fail-fast config option

[uriyyo]

Change Summary

Add list fail-fast config option.

Related issue number

fix: #1321

Checklist

• [x] Unit tests for the changes exist
• [ ] Documentation reflects the changes where applicable
• [x] Pydantic tests pass with this pydantic-core (except for expected changes)
• [x] My PR is ready to review, please add a comment including the phrase "please review" to assign reviewers

Selected Reviewer: @dmontagu

[uriyyo]

please review

[codspeed-hq[bot]]

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #1322 will not alter performance

_{Comparing uriyyo:list-fail-fast (27db075) with main (9507a28)}

Summary

✅ 155 untouched benchmarks

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 92.85714% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.	Files	Patch %	Lines
src/validators/tuple.rs	86.36%	3 Missing :warning:

:loudspeaker: Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

[uriyyo]

Great, I will update this PR to add this feature to more iterable types!

[adriangb]

Could we implement this as an exception, similar to PydanticOmit? That way a python-defined validator can control the flow.

[uriyyo]

@adriangb Makes sense to me, I will try to reimplement it in similar way as PydanticOmit is working

[adriangb]

It may be that both are necessary, there's mutliple use cases:

1. Inside of a python validator you want to abort the rest of the list, similar workflow to PydanticOmit
2. You just want to abort early with no python handler (like this PR implements)

[uriyyo]

Hi @adriangb @davidhewitt

This PR is ready with basic implementation of fail-fast feature for list, set, frozenset, and tuple types.

Could we implement this as an exception, similar to PydanticOmit? That way a python-defined validator can control the flow.

@adriangb I suggest implement this feature in separate PR just to make review/merge process easier. What do you think about it?

[adriangb]

Makes sense to me

[davidhewitt]

I see the Python PR is now prepared too, many thanks 🚀