Closed yezz123 closed 7 months ago
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Comparison is base (
d05c882
) 100.00% compared to head (5caa73e
) 100.00%. Report is 10 commits behind head on main.:exclamation: Current head 5caa73e differs from pull request most recent head 2838771. Consider uploading reports for the commit 2838771 to get more accurate results
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
I try it locally its working fine
Does this mean that you've tried serving the pydantic
docs locally with these changes, and things run as expected?
@yezz123,
Any chance you'll be able to incorporate some changes soon? Hoping to release a new version of pydantic
and would love to get this new version of pydantic-extra-types
in.
@sydney-runkle we are ready to go!
@yezz123,
Thanks for your work on this docs refactor. I'd like to provide some more feedback on some of the changes, and a lot of them aren't relevant to fixing the docs build issue we ran into with 2.4.0
. I've opened a PR here to fix those issues, then I'll address these changes early next week! https://github.com/pydantic/pydantic-extra-types/pull/125
I try it locally its working fine