Closed kroncatti closed 8 months ago
please review
We have more properties that could be added as shown in here. Do you think it's worth it ?
We have more properties that could be added as shown in here. Do you think it's worth it ?
Yes its totally worth it 👍🏻
I'll do it still on this PR then, thanks. Possibly today.
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Comparison is base (
5216db3
) 100.00% compared to head (ed611a0
) 100.00%.
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
Just did @yezz123, sorry for the time it took. If I did not miss anything, we should be good.
@yezz123 now we're ready for review 😄
Resolves #10
Resolves #10
please put this in the PR body so it closes the issue upon merge.
Done @samuelcolvin, thanks.
sorry for late review @kroncatti i will review it again today and test it then we can merge it 🙏🏻
Please don't merge this yet.
Let's try to get __get_pydantic_core_schema__
merged into https://github.com/mdomke/schwifty/ first.
@Kludex I've just request a review from you on this. You have control now over when it could be merged.
@Kludex I've just request a review from you on this. You have control now over when it could be merged.
So much power! 👀
I've opened https://github.com/mdomke/schwifty/issues/147 on schwifty
. 🙏
Amazing folks! thanks!
Amazing folks! thanks!
dnd :)
Hey folks,
It's been a few weeks we are waiting on this. What is you guys opinion ? Should we wait to merge ?
Hey folks,
It's been a few weeks we are waiting on this. What is you guys opinion ? Should we wait to merge ?
I think we should wait for https://github.com/mdomke/schwifty/issues/147.
Hey folks,
It's been a few weeks we are waiting on this. What is you guys opinion ? Should we wait to merge ?
I vote to move forward.
This PR is ready once we drop support for Python 3.7 🙏🏻 .
cc @kroncatti @Kludex
@kroncatti @yezz123 @Kludex Hi! I've implemented the Pydantic protocol support in https://github.com/mdomke/schwifty/issues/147 last year November. Sorry that it took me a while, but I was quite busy at the time. Is the implementation in schwifty
working for you or is there something that you need additionally, so that you have to create this wrapper type?
Oh, nice! Maybe we can add that to the Pydantic documentation?
Resolves #10
Selected Reviewer: @yezz123