Open rhandberg opened 4 years ago
Seems straightforward enough. I'm trying to pin down the exact casting behavior of the old scipy.stats.ss()
(seeing some discrepancies with hypothesis
fuzz testing), but once that's nailed down a nanss
should be trivial.
Thanks for raising!
Bottleneck already includes a fast sum-of-squares function (
ss
), but no NaN-aware counterpart exists. Wouldn't it make sense to add ananss
function?