The msgid value is an input to the send[n,c]_xxxxx methods of the Association class.
If no msg_id is passed in, it defaults to 1.
If these methods get called multiple times without passing in a parameter for msg_id, then each of the messages will have the same message ID (1).
A straight forward SCU can increment at the calling level, but if the Association is passed around that puts in a requirement for knowing what the last message ID was (assuming one wanted to increment monotonically) and passing that around along with the Association.
I think for many scenarios the value of the message ID is not a huge deal.
But for a C-MOVE-RQ... that can be important (I believe the message ID associated with the C-MOVE-RQ can be included in a C-STORE-RQ acting on the C-MOVE-RQ).
Would it be reasonable to have the Association maintain a monotonically increasing internal counter for msg_id (assuming nothing gets passed in) rather than defaulting to 1? At least until it hits the maximum value (at which point rolling over to 1 seems like a reasonable option).
The msgid value is an input to the send[n,c]_xxxxx methods of the Association class. If no msg_id is passed in, it defaults to 1. If these methods get called multiple times without passing in a parameter for msg_id, then each of the messages will have the same message ID (1). A straight forward SCU can increment at the calling level, but if the Association is passed around that puts in a requirement for knowing what the last message ID was (assuming one wanted to increment monotonically) and passing that around along with the Association. I think for many scenarios the value of the message ID is not a huge deal. But for a C-MOVE-RQ... that can be important (I believe the message ID associated with the C-MOVE-RQ can be included in a C-STORE-RQ acting on the C-MOVE-RQ). Would it be reasonable to have the Association maintain a monotonically increasing internal counter for msg_id (assuming nothing gets passed in) rather than defaulting to 1? At least until it hits the maximum value (at which point rolling over to 1 seems like a reasonable option).