Open utensil opened 4 years ago
It's inconsistent with implementation and the original literature
How so? Looks identical to the implementation and literature to me, if you start with the assumption that r and s are non-negative
This is particularly wrong (my own mistake). And the formula fails to mention how it should be like for arbitrary multivectors (i.e. the summing).
Apart from the out of place "of", that sentence is true, isn't it?
And the formula fails to mention how it should be like for arbitrary multivectors
That's fair.
It might be worth adding the mathematical description to the docstring of hestenes_dot
Apart from the out of place "of", that sentence is true, isn't it?
No. It intended to describe how it works, not a consequence of how it works.
In https://nbviewer.jupyter.org/github/pygae/galgebra/blob/master/examples/ipython/inner_product.ipynb :
It's inconsistent with implementation and the original literature:
This should be corrected. And it's better to add some description of all three definitions:
from Geometric Algebra with Applications in Science and Engineering .