Closed Tzaphkiel closed 10 years ago
Thanks for detailed report, but this project is only about the python api doc generation and there is no chance that any GExiv maintainer will see this.
Please file a report here: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=gexiv2
Apologies for that, I have just done so: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=722406
As I don't have a bugzilla acocunt so I report it here for the time being.
calling :
yields the same value. The fnumber returns the Iso value for some reason.
The image data is sound because when I get the Aperture with
I get the correct value.
The code is referencing the wrong exif tag name: