Add a shortcut for removing file(s) by name

[liamhuber]

Introduces the following convenience method to DirectoryObject:

    def remove(self, *files: str):
        for file in files:
            path = self.get_path(file)
            if path.is_file():
                path.unlink()

[github-actions[bot]]

:point_left: Launch a binder notebook on branch _pyiron/pyiron_workflow/remove_filemethod

[codacy-production[bot]]

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation	Diff coverage
:white_check_mark: +0.03% (target: -1.00%)	:white_check_mark: 100.00%

Coverage variation details

| | Coverable lines | Covered lines | Coverage | | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | | Common ancestor commit (35b6d77ef7b1d04a97d22c213d6331d009b09438) | 2572 | 2195 | 85.34% | | | Head commit (33fad04882fbe819e60724c7dc8fd8b6eb50d63b) | 2577 (+5) | 2200 (+5) | 85.37% (**+0.03%**) | **Coverage variation** is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: ` - `

Diff coverage details

| | Coverable lines | Covered lines | Diff coverage | | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | | Pull request (#159) | 5 | 5 | **100.00%** | **Diff coverage** is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: `/ * 100%`

See your quality gate settings    Change summary preferences

_{You may notice some variations in coverage metrics with the latest Coverage engine update. For more details, visit the documentation}

[samwaseda]

Actually I don't really get the intention of this PR. I think by default people should delete the file from FileObject and not from the directory (except when all files should be erased)

[liamhuber]

Wouldn't that involve importing FoleObject and creating N of these based on the strings used in this shortcut and the DirectoryObject? This isn't horrid, I just wanted something even shorter. You can see the use in Node.__post__ over in the storage PR

[github-actions[bot]]

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 7534218211

• 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
• No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
• Overall coverage increased (+0.02%) to 90.288%

---

Totals
Change from base Build 7534135240:	0.02%
Covered Lines:	4676
Relevant Lines:	5179

---

💛 - Coveralls

[liamhuber]

@samwaseda if, on reflection, you think this is useful, feel free to merge it. However, I came around to your perspective that importing and instantiating a FileObject is also perfectly acceptable, and in my case (since I have only the one file I care about and already import DirectoryObject) not particularly more work. I've dropped it from the history of #160 and don't depend on it.

So if you still dislike it, just close the PR; I still don't hate it, but am quite indifferent now.

[samwaseda]

Still not really sure about this one, but I also don't feel strongly against it, so I merged it :D