[minor] 0.10.0

[liamhuber]

I want to release a patch version before the next minor bump, to facilitate easy conversion from existing storage formats to pickle. This then serves as a landing platform for all the work after that which will require a minor bump.

• [x] Only pickle as a storage backend #414
• [x] Streamline storage architecture (leave it extensible and tests looping over backends to make re-introducing a different backend easy)
• [x] Remove node job and trim dependencies #415 -- Closes #46
• [x] Remove node packages and their registration #417 -- Closes #400
• [x] Remove working directory -- Closes #401 and #316
• [x] Revisit documentation #433
• [x] WAIT for 0.9.5 to be released, so there is an intermediate version available to allow users to easily upgrade from h5-serialized workflows to pickle-serialization
• [x] Purge HasToDict #435
• [x] ~Make fetching and pushing signals private inputs to run, so you can still break the "truth" of a graph state, but you really need to want to~ This is complicated and maybe even undesirable. I've come around to the thinking that rather it should be very easy to tell whether the current input to a node is synchronized with the current output of that node, or whether it needs to be run. This is easier and closely related to cache_hit. This afternoon I've been playing around with using traitlets to catch desynchronizations of IO. It's not ready now because traitlets uses __getstate__ in some ways that interfere with what I'm doing, but I think it's promising. For now, I'll just make Node.cached_inputs private so that any switch in this direction can stay a patch change.

[review-notebook-app[bot]]

Check out this pull request on 

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.

---

Powered by ReviewNB

[github-actions[bot]]

:point_left: Launch a binder notebook on branch _pyiron/pyiron_workflow/minorbump

[codacy-production[bot]]

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation	Diff coverage
:x: -1.23% (target: -1.00%)	:white_check_mark: 78.31%

Coverage variation details

| | Coverable lines | Covered lines | Coverage | | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | | Common ancestor commit (3bd6241f3a77678f9b160ad406966824d3ed0c3e) | 3599 | 3331 | 92.55% | | | Head commit (cef10fb20012dbf463e323d52e6c1ecd9a6b33e2) | 3099 (-500) | 2830 (-501) | 91.32% (**-1.23%**) | **Coverage variation** is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: ` - `

Diff coverage details

| | Coverable lines | Covered lines | Diff coverage | | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | ------------- | | Pull request (#413) | 249 | 195 | **78.31%** | **Diff coverage** is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: `/ * 100%`

See your quality gate settings    Change summary preferences

_{Codacy stopped sending the deprecated coverage status on June 5th, 2024. Learn more}

[coveralls]

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 10517318730

Details

• 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
• 141 unchanged lines in 12 files lost coverage.
• Overall coverage decreased (-1.2%) to 91.32%

---

Files with Coverage Reduction	New Missed Lines	%
nodes/transform.py	1	99.39%
nodes/for_loop.py	2	98.22%
create.py	4	93.44%
mixin/semantics.py	5	96.91%
nodes/static_io.py	6	85.71%
nodes/macro.py	8	92.65%
channels.py	11	94.78%
nodes/composite.py	13	90.4%
io.py	14	94.19%
node.py	21	90.95%
<!--	Total:	141		-->

Totals
Change from base Build 10374248662:	-1.2%
Covered Lines:	2830
Relevant Lines:	3099

---

💛 - Coveralls