We have Composite.graph_as_dict, but there is an appetite for something even stringier. I currently imagine output like:
{
"some_parent": "mypackage.macros.ThisAwesomeMacro",
"children": {
"c1": "pyiron_workflow.nodes.standard.UserInput",
"c2": {
#... blah blah, the point is it's a macro so we nest the representation
},
"c3": "anotherpackage.DoIt",
}
"data_edges": (
("c1.user_input", "c2.foobar"),
("c2.out1", "c3.i_need_this"),
("c2.out2", "c3.also_this"),
)
"execution_edges": (
("c1.ran", "c2.run"),
("c2.ran", "c3.run"),
)
}
I don't see any obstacle to doing this, graph_as_dict is already extremely similar, but it muddies things by actually including instances in the dictionary. This just strings it all down.
We have
Composite.graph_as_dict
, but there is an appetite for something even stringier. I currently imagine output like:I don't see any obstacle to doing this,
graph_as_dict
is already extremely similar, but it muddies things by actually including instances in the dictionary. This just strings it all down.