Multiple binary | operation in a single statement failed with "E1131: unsupported operand type(s) for | (unsupported-binary-operation)"

[Wayonb]

Bug description

If I am trying to OR more than two flags, pylint 2.15.0 fails with "E1131: unsupported operand type(s) for | (unsupported-binary-operation)". This worked with pylint 2.14.1

    class MosaicFlags(Flag):
        NONE = 0
        SUPPLY_MUTABLE = 1
        TRANSFERABLE = 2
        RESTRICTABLE = 4
        REVOKABLE = 8

value = MosaicFlags.SUPPLY_MUTABLE | MosaicFlags.RESTRICTABLE | MosaicFlags.REVOKABLE

Configuration

No response

Command used

python3 -m pylint --rcfile .pylintrc --load-plugins pylint_quotes

Pylint output

************* Module tests.test_RuleBasedTransactionFactory
tests/test_RuleBasedTransactionFactory.py:148:3: E1131: unsupported operand type(s) for | (unsupported-binary-operation)
tests/test_RuleBasedTransactionFactory.py:164:10: E1131: unsupported operand type(s) for | (unsupported-binary-operation)

Expected behavior

Expected no errors

Pylint version

pylint 2.15.0
Python 3.8.10

OS / Environment

Ubuntu 20.04

Additional dependencies

isort==5.10.1 pycodestyle==2.9.1 pylint==2.15.0 pylint-quotes==0.2.3

[RemiCardona]

Same issue when using Django's "Q objects" https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/3.1/topics/db/queries/#complex-lookups-with-q

2 Q objects |-ed or &-ed together is fine, 3 or more breaks pylint. We're getting hundreds of errors as Q objects are a fairly common sight in Django projects.

[mbyrnepr2]

Thanks for the report. I can't reproduce this one myself:

(venv310) Marks-MacBook-Air-2:programming markbyrne$ pip freeze |grep pylint
pylint==2.15.0
pylint-quotes==0.2.3

(venv310) Marks-MacBook-Air-2:programming markbyrne$ pylint --version
pylint 2.15.0
astroid 2.12.5
Python 3.10.4 (v3.10.4:9d38120e33, Mar 23 2022, 17:29:05) [Clang 13.0.0 (clang-1300.0.29.30)]

(venv310) Marks-MacBook-Air-2:programming markbyrne$ cat example.py 
'''test'''

from enum import Flag

class MosaicFlags(Flag):
    """test"""
    NONE = 0
    SUPPLY_MUTABLE = 1
    TRANSFERABLE = 2
    RESTRICTABLE = 4
    REVOKABLE = 8

value = MosaicFlags.SUPPLY_MUTABLE | MosaicFlags.RESTRICTABLE | MosaicFlags.REVOKABLE
print(value)
(venv310) Marks-MacBook-Air-2:programming markbyrne$ pylint example.py --load-plugins pylint_quotes
************* Module programming.p
p.py:1:0: C4003: Invalid docstring quote ''', should be """ (invalid-docstring-quote)

------------------------------------------------------------------
Your code has been rated at 8.89/10 (previous run: 8.89/10, +0.00)

[Wayonb]

Hi @mbyrnepr2, Thanks for taking a look. Sorry, I didnt actually try the sample code. I was able to repo with the sample below.

pylint example.py --load-plugins pylint_quotes

from enum import Flag

class Module:
    """module"""

    class TestFlags(Flag):
        """test flags"""
        TEST_NONE = 0
        TEST_SUPPLY_MUTABLE = 1
        TEST_TRANSFERABLE = 2
        TEST_RESTRICTABLE = 4
        TEST_REVOKABLE = 8

class TestClass():
    """test class"""

    @staticmethod
    def _assert_flags_parser(value, expected):
        """assert"""
        pass

    def test_flags_parser_can_handle_multiple_string_flags(self):
        """test flags"""
        self._assert_flags_parser(
            'supply_mutable restrictable revokable',
            Module.TestFlags.TEST_SUPPLY_MUTABLE | Module.TestFlags.TEST_RESTRICTABLE | Module.TestFlags.TEST_REVOKABLE)

    @staticmethod
    def test_flags_parser_passes_non_parsed_values_as_is():
        """test parser"""
        value = Module.TestFlags.TEST_SUPPLY_MUTABLE | Module.TestFlags.TEST_RESTRICTABLE | Module.TestFlags.TEST_REVOKABLE
        print(value)

[SamyCookie]

if you want a shorter example without enum dependency you can reproduce this false positive bug with this:

class BinaryOperator:
    """ only make useless binary operations
    """
    def __or__(self, whatever):
        return 42
operators = [ BinaryOperator(), BinaryOperator() ]
def _fn(idx: int=0):
    print(operators[0] | operators[1])  # NO unsupported-binary-operation issue
    print(operators[idx] | operators[1])  # OUPS unsupported-binary-operation issue
_fn(0)

[mbyrnepr2]

Thanks for the examples.

@Wayonb you're right - something between 2.14.1 & 2.15.0 has led to this false positive. Note it happens only for Python versions below 3.10 because of this logic: https://github.com/PyCQA/pylint/blob/main/pylint/checkers/typecheck.py#L1879-L1880

[RemiCardona]

Is there any chance for part or all of the new type checker code to be reverted until the issue is fixed?

Thanks

[Pierre-Sassoulas]

@RemiCardona Without looking too much into it, the cost of fixing the issue is probably going to be smaller than the cost to partially revert (but the main problem is that we don't have contributions for either right now).

[DanielNoord]

@Pierre-Sassoulas I have been waiting on working on Enums more until https://github.com/PyCQA/astroid/pull/1598 gets merged. It's quite a substantial design change, but would facilitate more work on Enums very easily.

[mbyrnepr2]

It could be worth taking a look at this change. If I revert that one locally, I can't reproduce using the following example, provided in the comment above

example from the comment

```python from enum import Flag class Module: """module""" class TestFlags(Flag): """test flags""" TEST_NONE = 0 TEST_SUPPLY_MUTABLE = 1 TEST_TRANSFERABLE = 2 TEST_RESTRICTABLE = 4 TEST_REVOKABLE = 8 class TestClass(): """test class""" @staticmethod def _assert_flags_parser(value, expected): """assert""" pass def test_flags_parser_can_handle_multiple_string_flags(self): """test flags""" self._assert_flags_parser( 'supply_mutable restrictable revokable', Module.TestFlags.TEST_SUPPLY_MUTABLE | Module.TestFlags.TEST_RESTRICTABLE | Module.TestFlags.TEST_REVOKABLE) @staticmethod def test_flags_parser_passes_non_parsed_values_as_is(): """test parser""" value = Module.TestFlags.TEST_SUPPLY_MUTABLE | Module.TestFlags.TEST_RESTRICTABLE | Module.TestFlags.TEST_REVOKABLE print(value) ```

[belm0]

Here is my repro. Having the expression in the tuple seems to be necessary.

class MyFlag(enum.Flag):
    FOO = 1
    BAR = 2
    BAZ = 4

XX = (MyFlag.FOO | MyFlag.BAR | MyFlag.BAZ, 'hello')

[antonshack]

Here's another repro. Completing @belm0's one.

It seems placing the expression in a tuple, a list or passing it as a parameter of a function raises checker E1131. The union of at least three operands is also still required.

This was tested on the latest version released this morning (pylint 2.15.8/Python 3.9.10)

Repro

from enum import Flag

class MyFlag(Flag):
    FOO = 1
    BAR = 2
    BAZ = 3

def spam(eggs):
    ...

# No errors
spam(MyFlag.FOO | MyFlag.BAR)  # two operands
eggs = (MyFlag.FOO | MyFlag.BAR, "hello")  # two operands
eggs = MyFlag.FOO | MyFlag.BAR | MyFlag.BAZ  # expression *not* in a tuple, list nor function

# E1131: unsupported operand type(s) for | (unsupported-binary-operation)
spam(MyFlag.FOO | MyFlag.BAR | MyFlag.BAZ)  # 3 operands as a parameter of a function
eggs = (MyFlag.FOO | MyFlag.BAR | MyFlag.BAZ, "hello")  # 3 operands in a tuple
eggs = [MyFlag.FOO | MyFlag.BAR | MyFlag.BAZ, "hello"]  # 3 operands in a list

Env

> pylint --version
pylint 2.15.8
astroid 2.12.13
Python 3.9.10 (main, Jun  9 2022, 15:45:30) 
[GCC 9.3.1 20200408 (Red Hat 9.3.1-2)]

Expected results

unsupported-binary-operation error should not be raised.

[Pierre-Sassoulas]

Here's a django example from #7953 thanks to @masiak2:

from django.db import models
from django.db.models import Q

class Author(models.Model):
    name = models.CharField(max_length=200)
    email = models.EmailField()

# this is fine
qs = Author.objects.filter(Q(name="x") | Q(name="y"))

# this throws an unsupported-binary-operation error
qs2 = Author.objects.filter(Q(name="x") | Q(name="y") | Q(name="z"))

[Hubrrr88]

Another short example with Enum's Flag:

from enum import Flag, auto

class Selector(Flag):
    A = auto()
    B = auto()
    C = auto()

class Storage:
    selector = Selector.A | Selector.B

if __name__ == '__main__':
    storage = Storage()
    selector = storage.selector | Selector.C
    print(selector)

[Pierre-Sassoulas]

Another example:

"https://github.com/PyCQA/pylint/issues/8297"
from dataclasses import dataclass

@dataclass
class C:
    "class doc"
    a: str
    b: int = 10
    c: float | int | None = None

[sevdog]

I have tried the latest release (2.17.0) and this FP seems to be gone, but I cannot find any reference in the release notes https://github.com/PyCQA/pylint/releases/tag/v2.17.0

[belm0]

I have tried the latest release (2.17.0) and this FP seems to be gone

still seeing the false positive here on 2.17.0

[fechnert]

I am also able to reproduce this with django's Q objects with pylint==2.17.0.

[paulking86]

Still seeing this issue in pylint==2.17.7 👍

[CareF]

Another example:

"""module comment"""""
from enum import auto, Flag

class MyFlag(Flag):
    """class comment"""
    A = auto()
    B = auto()
    C = auto()
    ALL = A | B | C

under py3.8 & 3.9.

However it's not showing issue with py3.11